Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
Welcome to this critique thread. Please read the purpose statement and the guidelines/ground rules regarding participation.
Purpose
The primary purpose of this thread is to provide a forum where photographers can give and receive constructive criticism on one another's photographs. By setting up some basic guidelines we hope that this thread will provide a forum where the give and take of honest constructive criticism can help us become better photographers.
Guidelines/Ground Rules
The thread has very specific rules regarding participation. The one basic rule is that you cannot provide criticism on an image or comment in a critique thread unless you also have an image posted. To post an image to this thread you must be a participant. Participation in this thread is limited. Here are the guidelines and ground rules for participation:
• Participation in this thread is limited to 5 photographers
• Participants join the thread by posting their intention. You can simply reply with your intent to join by posting something like: "I'm joining," "I'm in," or just state your name
• Joining is on a "first come, first served" basis. The first 5 to reply become the participants.
• Please, only join this thread if you are able post an image within 24 hours of joining.
• Once the thread has 5 participants, no other photographers can join or participate in the thread
• Once the thread is full of participants all photographers will upload their image(s)
• Please abide by any thematic requirement (e.g., landscape, portrait, etc.)
•The number of photos for each participant is limited to one
• Photographers attach photos as thumbnails (no inline images or links)
• Photos should be standard screen resolution (72~90) and the longest side of the image approximately 10 inches in length.
• Photographers post their images supplying titles (if any) and other pertinent information (the amount of information should be minimal)
• Photographers can only comment on their own images and reply to comments only when everyone else in the thread has posted their comments on the image
• Every participant must comment on every photo (except their own—initially)
• Every participant must make at least two comments, one positive comment, and one constructive criticism (which is actually two positive comments)
• Once every photographer has commented then a free flowing discussion begins. It is at this point that every photographer can comment on their own work and reply to comments, ask questions, etc.
• The participants decide when the thread closes.
If you'd like to participate in a critique thread and need some ideas about how to proceed with viewing images critically, you may find this thread helpful:
How do you look at photos
You can also provide feedback on critique threads here:
Critique Feedback Thread
Remember: Please do not provide criticism on an image or comment in a critique thread unless you also have an image posted.
This thread is now active, please follow the guidelines if you'd like to participate! Have Fun!
Purpose
The primary purpose of this thread is to provide a forum where photographers can give and receive constructive criticism on one another's photographs. By setting up some basic guidelines we hope that this thread will provide a forum where the give and take of honest constructive criticism can help us become better photographers.
Guidelines/Ground Rules
The thread has very specific rules regarding participation. The one basic rule is that you cannot provide criticism on an image or comment in a critique thread unless you also have an image posted. To post an image to this thread you must be a participant. Participation in this thread is limited. Here are the guidelines and ground rules for participation:
• Participation in this thread is limited to 5 photographers
• Participants join the thread by posting their intention. You can simply reply with your intent to join by posting something like: "I'm joining," "I'm in," or just state your name
• Joining is on a "first come, first served" basis. The first 5 to reply become the participants.
• Please, only join this thread if you are able post an image within 24 hours of joining.
• Once the thread has 5 participants, no other photographers can join or participate in the thread
• Once the thread is full of participants all photographers will upload their image(s)
• Please abide by any thematic requirement (e.g., landscape, portrait, etc.)
•The number of photos for each participant is limited to one
• Photographers attach photos as thumbnails (no inline images or links)
• Photos should be standard screen resolution (72~90) and the longest side of the image approximately 10 inches in length.
• Photographers post their images supplying titles (if any) and other pertinent information (the amount of information should be minimal)
• Photographers can only comment on their own images and reply to comments only when everyone else in the thread has posted their comments on the image
• Every participant must comment on every photo (except their own—initially)
• Every participant must make at least two comments, one positive comment, and one constructive criticism (which is actually two positive comments)
• Once every photographer has commented then a free flowing discussion begins. It is at this point that every photographer can comment on their own work and reply to comments, ask questions, etc.
• The participants decide when the thread closes.
If you'd like to participate in a critique thread and need some ideas about how to proceed with viewing images critically, you may find this thread helpful:
How do you look at photos
You can also provide feedback on critique threads here:
Critique Feedback Thread
Remember: Please do not provide criticism on an image or comment in a critique thread unless you also have an image posted.
This thread is now active, please follow the guidelines if you'd like to participate! Have Fun!
Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
Please note that this new thread is for those who wanted to participate in the current Portrait Critique, but didn't get a spot.
If you have a spot in the ongoing Portrait Critique threads, please allow others take their turn.
If you have a spot in the ongoing Portrait Critique threads, please allow others take their turn.
R
RML
Guest
I'm joining.
visiondr
cyclic iconoclast
Call me In
Ron
Ron
shiro_kuro
Charles Bowen
Count me in also
ampguy
Veteran
I'm in.
......................
......................
Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
Me in too (Ray's done it too, right?) -- This thread hung in da balance for a few days.
ampguy
Veteran
here's mine
here's mine
RD1, rokkor 40/2, cropped, feeling lucky, fill in picasa. no photoshop.
here's mine
RD1, rokkor 40/2, cropped, feeling lucky, fill in picasa. no photoshop.
ampguy said:I'm in.
......................
Attachments
visiondr
cyclic iconoclast
visiondr said:Call me In
Ron
Here's my entry:
Attachments
R
RML
Guest
shiro_kuro
Charles Bowen
Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
I'll post this evening 
Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
visiondr
cyclic iconoclast
Ok, It looks like I'll dive in...
Gabriel:
Dynamic and visually interesting pose, looking off in the middle distance with a stance that's angled just to the right. The colours are brilliant and saturated (and serve as something of a secondary focal point) yet the skin tones appear right on.
The hand position is a bit out of place for me. Just can't explain why it doesn't feel right (not, therefore, a valid point of criticism). Also, would have aimed for a shallower DOF to emphasize the subject.
ampguy:
Pleasing OOF areas. I'm left with the feeling that the little girl is pouting and her toy rat is her best buddy right at this point. A cute moment in a child's life. Makes me think of similar emotions in my own child.
I'm not sure who the subject here is, especially since the focus point appears to be the rat's eye. As one of my coworkers said (though, admittedly, not a photographer) "what's with the rat?"
RML:
"Concentration" would be an apt title here. She is really absorbed in the moment. Exposure is good, focus accurate.
I'd like to see some movement or a sense of movement. She is, after all, playing a violin. I want to be able to "hear" the playing.
Shiro_Kuro:
Aloof, distant, unapproachable are what come to mind looking at the Geisha. The blur is perfect for the image as she looks even more far away. Her expression is of stoicism.
Distracting background and foreground. The apparently metal railings don't seem to belong with such an 19th century (at least to my Western mind) tradition. Though the obliquely angled railing does serve to help bring my eye back to the subject.
Gabriel:
Dynamic and visually interesting pose, looking off in the middle distance with a stance that's angled just to the right. The colours are brilliant and saturated (and serve as something of a secondary focal point) yet the skin tones appear right on.
The hand position is a bit out of place for me. Just can't explain why it doesn't feel right (not, therefore, a valid point of criticism). Also, would have aimed for a shallower DOF to emphasize the subject.
ampguy:
Pleasing OOF areas. I'm left with the feeling that the little girl is pouting and her toy rat is her best buddy right at this point. A cute moment in a child's life. Makes me think of similar emotions in my own child.
I'm not sure who the subject here is, especially since the focus point appears to be the rat's eye. As one of my coworkers said (though, admittedly, not a photographer) "what's with the rat?"
RML:
"Concentration" would be an apt title here. She is really absorbed in the moment. Exposure is good, focus accurate.
I'd like to see some movement or a sense of movement. She is, after all, playing a violin. I want to be able to "hear" the playing.
Shiro_Kuro:
Aloof, distant, unapproachable are what come to mind looking at the Geisha. The blur is perfect for the image as she looks even more far away. Her expression is of stoicism.
Distracting background and foreground. The apparently metal railings don't seem to belong with such an 19th century (at least to my Western mind) tradition. Though the obliquely angled railing does serve to help bring my eye back to the subject.
shiro_kuro
Charles Bowen
@Gabriel..... Very nice colors and look in her eye and use of light .... The focus point seems to be on the leading shoulder perhaps more sharpness on her face ...she has wonderful eyes and I think it would make difference in this portrait to see the sharpness in her eyes... something about her position in the photograph seems out of balance .... my eyes get pulled down to the bottom of the image....
Attachments
shiro_kuro
Charles Bowen
@RML..... Great shot of your daughter ..... The look on her face and her hand position and the slight movement of the bow ...I get a sense of her confidence and grace playing the violin .. I can see a little bit of light on the right side of her face .. I think maybe if there were more light on her face and a bit more detail in the sweater ... would make this image come more alive
shiro_kuro
Charles Bowen
@Ampguy.... I think think this is a well captured moment ... I like the way she seems unaware of you yet you are so close ...The image allows the viewer to share in this moment without intruding ....she and her rat seem mesmerized by something .... my nephew has the same look when he is watching tv : )
shiro_kuro
Charles Bowen
@visiondr..... nice shot ....a boy and his wheels ..... He looks proud ... Color and your use of dof works well in this image .... the only thing I can critique is you you cut the wheel on the wagon : ) maybe if you took one step back .. I think if you gave him a bit more space ...
Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
ampguy said:RD1, rokkor 40/2, cropped, feeling lucky, fill in picasa. no photoshop.
I like the natural, casual feeling, and the framing and placement of the eyes on the frame look appropriate with what's presented. I would balance the color temperature (some more blue/violet) to get rid of the yellow-greenish cast.
The prominent appearance of the toy rat must mean something, and we are to assume that there is some sort of relationship between the girl and the toy that is more than mere ownership.
Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
The main subject is centered on the frame, and there is proper space between the head and feet to the edges of the frame. This is what I would say is more of an "environmental portrait", for here we have a young, small boy with a toy, outside in what appears to be a garden, very possibly where he spends a lot of time playing. It would have been a good thing if one of the wheels had been fully inside the frame.visiondr said:Here's my entry:
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.