Did any brand ever make a camera like this?

Juan Valdenebro

Truth is beauty
Local time
4:43 PM
Joined
May 23, 2009
Messages
4,352
Location
Barcelona and Colombia
Hi, I would like to get a camera like the 70s' compact rangefinders (fixed lens), but without autoexposure: manual speeds setting, and a 35mm lens.
Was it ever made?
I don't need meter, and it will be for scale focusing, so no rf is required.
I wasn't able to find one on the net...
Thanks!
Cheers,
Juan
 
One of the early Minolta Hi-Matics comes to mind. I used to own one: almost like an Instamatic: 40mm f1.7 lens, no AE (but meter) and situation focusing (landscape, group and portrait modes). Must figure out which model it is... Got it VERY inexpensively priced in the *bay.
 
Ricoh 35 ZF (Zone Focus)

Ricoh 35 ZF (Zone Focus)

Here's one that I owned many years ago.
Remove the battery and go have some fun!
The Ricoh 35 ZF is a viewfinder camera with a fixed lens made in Taiwan by Ricoh from 1966.

Specifications
Type: viewfinder camera
Film: 35mm
Lens: Rikenon f 2.8 / 40mm
Shutter: Ricoh, Speeds 1/8 - 1/500 sec + B
Focusing: zone focus with 3 symbols (1m, 2.5m, infinity).
Exposure Control: manual shutter speed selection, aperture controlled by CdS meter or manually.
Power: Originally a PX625 mercury cell.
Dimensions: 111x71x56mm
Weight: 400g
 

Attachments

  • Ricoh 35 ZF.jpg
    Ricoh 35 ZF.jpg
    5.3 KB · Views: 0
Lens: Fixed Lens 35mm
Shutter: Manual
Exposure: Manual
Focus: Manual (scale or rangefinder)
Meter: No / Optional

Here's a few possibilities:

Minolta AutoWide
Welmy Wide
Walz Wide
Ricoh Wide
Olympus Wide S
Mamiya 35 Wide
 
Petri 7s ticks all the boxes except it has a 45mm f2.8 lens. Although it's a RF, it has a distance scale on the lens barrel so you can prefocus. It also has a battery-less exposure meter (under/over needle reading in viewfinder). Shutter speeds to B to 1/500, apertures to f16. It's about the same size as an M.

Why not consider a Barnack, or a Japanese or Russian Barnack copy? They are small and nice to use. You can add an external finder if you want.
 
Zone focus would be more difficult with the typical 40-45mm of the 1970s fixed lens RFs, so a 35 makes sense. A CL will provide a much nicer viewfinder than nearly any other option. CLs with dead meters are fairly common, and inexpensive but the 35mm lens will boost the price. A working barnack with a quality viewfinder will probably cost more than a CL.

What's the budget? If it's low, then some compromise is probably necessary...what is the feature order of preference? If AE is an acceptable compromise than a Yashica CC is it...fast 35/1.8.
 
Back
Top Bottom