kermaier
Well-known
Hi all, who knows which Elmar 50mm lenses can/cannot be collapsed on the R-D1?
Thanks,
Ari
Thanks,
Ari
tajart
ancien
i have two, 3.5 & 2.8 thread mounts, both of which seem like they would be too deep when collapsed, though i don't know for certain since i didn't want to take a chance of pushing up against the sensor. i've only done a couple shots with the 2.8 and it looks like it has nice characteristics.
LCT
ex-newbie
I own two current Elmar's from 1994 & 2004 and two Epson bodies, R-D1 & R-D1s.
Both lenses touch the roller cam of the rangefinder when i collapse them.
Do the test carefully. You'll see that the tube does not slide as smoothly as on a Leica M for instance because the bottom of the tube hits slightly the roller cam each time you collapse it.
Also my 1994 version touches something else into the body when focussed at infinity.
Both lenses touch the roller cam of the rangefinder when i collapse them.
Do the test carefully. You'll see that the tube does not slide as smoothly as on a Leica M for instance because the bottom of the tube hits slightly the roller cam each time you collapse it.
Also my 1994 version touches something else into the body when focussed at infinity.
kermaier
Well-known
Anyone know about the older 50/2.8 M-mount?
LCT
ex-newbie
My 1962 version can be collapsed with no problem on R-D1 & R-D1s. Less sharp and contrasty than the current version. Easier to avoid blown highlights with digital. More flare though. Slightly harsher bokeh as well. Also the tube rotates when focusing so polar filters are not handy. Close focus 1m instead of .7m.Anyone know about the older 50/2.8 M-mount?
Last edited:
LCT
ex-newbie
Simple way to avoid problems:
kermaier
Well-known
My 1962 version can be collapsed with no problem on R-D1 & R-D1s. Less sharp and contrasty than the current version. Easier to avoid blown highlights with digital. More flare though. Slightly harsher bokeh as well. Also the tube rotates when focusing so polar filters are not handy. Close focus 1m instead of .7m.
Thanks, LCT, that's good info. Sounds like this version is the only one that can be safely collapsed on the R-D1. (BTW, why do you have a guard on your barrel to prevent collapsing if it's not a problem?)
My Canon 25/3.5 LTM has aperture and focus rings on the same rotating barrel, so I'm used to that particular ergonomic infelicity already.
Do you get bad flare even with a hood?
Do you have any example pictures from this lens on the R-D1?
Thanks,
Ari
LCT
ex-newbie
The guard is on my 1994 version. Flare at f/2.8:...why do you have a guard on your barrel to prevent collapsing if it's not a problem?...Do you get bad flare even with a hood?....
Attachments
LCT
ex-newbie
LCT
ex-newbie
kermaier
Well-known
OK, results-wise, the newer version is clearly superior to the old.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.