N
Nick R.
Guest
Thought I might compare some photos while I have both scanners.
Here's the same negative scanned with Minolta scan elite II dedicated film scanner and from an Epson 4870 flat bed type. The epson did better than I thought but as you can see some of the surface texture and contrast is lost. However, I wonder how much of this is due to the crummy epson film holder. (I matched the scans the best I could. They're not exactly the same but represent the original tifs pretty closely).
Here's the same negative scanned with Minolta scan elite II dedicated film scanner and from an Epson 4870 flat bed type. The epson did better than I thought but as you can see some of the surface texture and contrast is lost. However, I wonder how much of this is due to the crummy epson film holder. (I matched the scans the best I could. They're not exactly the same but represent the original tifs pretty closely).