Matthew Runkel
Well-known
In his Leica Lens Compendium, Erwin Puts makes a couple of interesting comments about comparisons between the highly-regarded original 90/2.8 Elmarit and the 4- and 3-element versions of the 90/4 Elmar:
The Elmarit is often cited as the best performer among all the pre-current Leica 90s. The 3-element, when mentioned at all, is most often noted as a premium-priced collectible novelty that is somewhat ahead of its 4-element predecessor (although Sherry Krauter has said the 3-element is a special lens). I'd be interested in anyone's thoughts and experiences, including those concerning things Puts generally doesn't care about such as bokeh.
[Discussing the Elmarit] "Performance was better at full aperture than the [4-element] Elmar at 1:4 . . . ."
[Discussing the 3-element Elmar] "At 1:4 the contrast gets visibly higher and now very fine detail is recorded over the whole image area with good clarity. The Elmarit 1:2.8/90mm at 1:4 cannot equal the 3-element Elmar here."
The Elmarit is often cited as the best performer among all the pre-current Leica 90s. The 3-element, when mentioned at all, is most often noted as a premium-priced collectible novelty that is somewhat ahead of its 4-element predecessor (although Sherry Krauter has said the 3-element is a special lens). I'd be interested in anyone's thoughts and experiences, including those concerning things Puts generally doesn't care about such as bokeh.





