TenEleven
Well-known
I have tried and failed to mount a Carl Zeiss Opton 50/1.5 Sonnar with a frozen aperture mechanism, which common for those early silver-nose models, into a M39 Jupiter-3 lens tube and helical.
1. The front element has slightly different curvature and diameter, however this is so minimal that it will completely fit into the J3 mount.
2. The rear triplet in my particular Opton Sonnar was a press-fit with no threads. So I .. "liberated" it out of its mount using a metal file. The rear triplet is the exact same shape and dimensions as the J3 one. It can be mounted in either a KMZ element holder or straight into a later J3 lens tube, both fit.
3. The middle triplet is where the problems arise. Its diameter is identical, so it will slide right in for a tight fit. However the rear part, which faces the aperture mechanism has a different shape. When tightening down this ends up pressing against the aperture which does two things:
I'm going to attach a picture of the rear elements side by side to this thread later.
1. The front element has slightly different curvature and diameter, however this is so minimal that it will completely fit into the J3 mount.
2. The rear triplet in my particular Opton Sonnar was a press-fit with no threads. So I .. "liberated" it out of its mount using a metal file. The rear triplet is the exact same shape and dimensions as the J3 one. It can be mounted in either a KMZ element holder or straight into a later J3 lens tube, both fit.
3. The middle triplet is where the problems arise. Its diameter is identical, so it will slide right in for a tight fit. However the rear part, which faces the aperture mechanism has a different shape. When tightening down this ends up pressing against the aperture which does two things:
- renders the aperture mechanism inoperable
- prevents the lens from being fully seated in its mount changing the inter-element spacing. I've tested it as-is and while one can bring the focal length "back in" with the main shim and rear triplet adjustments there still is excessive curvature of field
I'm going to attach a picture of the rear elements side by side to this thread later.