pab
Established
Folks
Has anyone tested Provia 400F versus E200 pushed to 320 as a fast slide film for very contrasty scenes e.g. narrow medieval streets in noonday sun? I'm thinking of situations where Astia 100F, although good for high contrast scenes, just wouldn't give enough depth of field.
Which do you think would give better flesh tones in this situation?
Per
Has anyone tested Provia 400F versus E200 pushed to 320 as a fast slide film for very contrasty scenes e.g. narrow medieval streets in noonday sun? I'm thinking of situations where Astia 100F, although good for high contrast scenes, just wouldn't give enough depth of field.
Which do you think would give better flesh tones in this situation?
Per
robert blu
quiet photographer
I did not make the comparisation you suggest. I use on a regular basis provia 400F when I have to work inside with available light and in some occasion Ihad to use it in real sunlight (film already in camera) and I have been surprised in a positive way from results.
JoeFriday
Agent Provacateur
here are some Provia 400F shots that I took in a similar environment
http://www.flickr.com/photos/theotherbrett/tags/parkcity/
and I've found that Provia gives fairly accurate fleshtones
http://www.flickr.com/photos/theotherbrett/tags/parkcity/
and I've found that Provia gives fairly accurate fleshtones
pab
Established
Thanks
I'll do some experiments with Provia 400. I find that E200 at 320 holds shadow detail quite well, but Caucasian flesh can turn quite red in the shadows. I'm not finding the colour response very predictable.
Per
I'll do some experiments with Provia 400. I find that E200 at 320 holds shadow detail quite well, but Caucasian flesh can turn quite red in the shadows. I'm not finding the colour response very predictable.
Per
Share: