Ronald_H
Don't call me Ron
Now and then I still shoot a concert. That's something I did a lot in the past, both with analogue and digital SLRs. Since I rediscovered film I like to bring an old Nikon to artists I like but aren't that famous (yet). Translation: No silliness with security etc.
Last year I found a non-AI 135mm f2.8 'Q' Nikkor on a camera fair. This only works on my FM and FE and is very old (1965). Only stop down metering is inconvenient. But is was also very cheap, so I bought it. Does it deliver? Oh yes:
The Belgian singer/songwriter Selah Sue. Nikon FM with 135mm f2.8 'Q' Nikkor (wide open). Fuji Neopan 1600 developed in Diafine, scanned with a Nikon Coolscan V.
Last year I found a non-AI 135mm f2.8 'Q' Nikkor on a camera fair. This only works on my FM and FE and is very old (1965). Only stop down metering is inconvenient. But is was also very cheap, so I bought it. Does it deliver? Oh yes:

The Belgian singer/songwriter Selah Sue. Nikon FM with 135mm f2.8 'Q' Nikkor (wide open). Fuji Neopan 1600 developed in Diafine, scanned with a Nikon Coolscan V.
rxmd
May contain traces of nut
Nice one!
Maybe I'll go to Houten once again one of these years again, you always find something and I could use a 24mm for the Nikon
Maybe I'll go to Houten once again one of these years again, you always find something and I could use a 24mm for the Nikon
Dave Wilkinson
Veteran
Very nice!....love my old Nikkors!, have you tried a 105mm f2.5? - my favourite.
Dave.
Dave.
Ronald_H
Don't call me Ron
It was not bought in Houten, but in Doesburg
I love to go to Houten though and buy stuff I don't need. After all this years I've got gear for any occasion. But a Hassy 500 C/M would be nice...
I did not try the 105mm f2.5. Is that a Macro lens? I don't have one of those yet, not much onto flowers and bees
I did not try the 105mm f2.5. Is that a Macro lens? I don't have one of those yet, not much onto flowers and bees
Roger Hicks
Veteran
Gorgeous!
But I'd back the photographer against the lens/camera/film-dev combo any day.
Congratulations,
R.
But I'd back the photographer against the lens/camera/film-dev combo any day.
Congratulations,
R.
Ronald_H
Don't call me Ron
Gorgeous!
But I'd back the photographer against the lens/camera/film-dev combo any day.
Congratulations,
R.
Thanks Roger, that means a lot, coming from you. My B/W photography definitely has improved thanks to your articles and the Black and White handbook. You never know, I might build my own darkroom one day. But to be honest, I have an awful lot still to learn. Pictures like the one I posted motivate me greatly though.
BillBingham2
Registered User
If you were not across the pond I would send one over to you. I have way too much stuff. It is the one thing I miss most of all from years back. While it's more expensive than a computer, it's a whole lot more fun.
I've always loved B&W because of the control it allows me. I was never been able to get a good color print from my own two hands. Slides just allowed me to capture the picture the way I saw it. Other than custom printing I never found any place that would print them as I shot them, always looking for the generic/normal/LCD exposure. Heck, if I want it to look dark make it print dark.
B2 (;->
I've always loved B&W because of the control it allows me. I was never been able to get a good color print from my own two hands. Slides just allowed me to capture the picture the way I saw it. Other than custom printing I never found any place that would print them as I shot them, always looking for the generic/normal/LCD exposure. Heck, if I want it to look dark make it print dark.
B2 (;->
Dave Wilkinson
Veteran
No - not a macro ! but arguably a better portrait lens than your 135mm!I did not try the 105mm f2.5. Is that a Macro lens? I don't have one of those yet, not much onto flowers and bees![]()
Dave.
shadowfox
Darkroom printing lives
No - not a macro ! but arguably a better portrait lens than your 135mm!- very nice in Leica screw mount to!
Dave.
Well Dave, since you said 'arguably'
I'll take the 135mm any day for shooting portrait than the 105mm.
I know that the 105mm is very famous and no doubt it's a great lens, but I just like the focal length 135mm better for isolating the subject from the background.
Right now I have the perfect (for me, of course) Nikon manual focus kit with the 135mm Q, 35mm S, both f/2.8 and an F3 attached to the imposing MD-4 motor drive/sledgehammer
Ronald, that's an image worth celebrating!
BillBingham2
Registered User
....better for isolating the subject from the background.....
I would prefer a 180/2.8 ED or my long gone 300/4.5 ED-IF, now that's isolation.
B2 (%>
shadowfox
Darkroom printing lives
I would prefer a 180/2.8 ED or my long gone 300/4.5 ED-IF, now that's isolation.
B2 (%>
Bill, I'd call that extreme isolation
Plus I still like to handheld my shots. The 135mm Q is one heavy lens as is.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.