Fuji Reala (iso 100) Shot At 400 Iso

[iñaki]

Today It´s been a nice sunny f16 here, and I have been shotting some photos. First I have finished a b&w ISO 400 roll, and then I have changed it to Fuji reala (ISO 100 color). After using ISO 400 for 8 months I have forgotten to change the ISO setting in my Bessa R, so I have shot about 25 frames underexposed by 2 stops :bang: :bang:
Then I have exposed the rest of the roll correctly.

I use to give my negs to a lab and then I scan the negatives.

What is going to happen with those negatives?
Is it better to forget about that roll?

It´s been a great day anyway 🙂

 

[wlewisiii]

Depends on a lot. I'd have it developed and not worry too much about it. If nothing else, you'll get to see just how much latitude the film really has 🙂

William

 

[iñaki]

Yes, I will have it developed, there are about 12 well exposed frames.
I will post some examples of the underexposed shots.

 

[Fedzilla_Bob]

Since you scan your own you may be able to get better results than the lab. One thing I think you will notice is grain in the underexposed images.

 

[dmr]

My guess is that unless you're shooting the proverbial black cat in the coal bin, they may come out acceptable.

It's been my experience that most of the Fuji negative films are able to take a joke, as far as being over or under exposed somewhat.

 

[iñaki]

I was shotting outdoor in a park, some frames with bright sun, and others under a tree in a park. I overexposed some of them (not really) 1/3 stop, so maybe it could help. I will post the examples in this thread soon 😉