conradyiu
closer
If you were me (not collector but user), you have been using P with your 35mm and 50mm often, will you buy a VI L?
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
no, not really.
as a user it won't do anything more for you.
the finders on the VIT/VIL seem to have more internal flare than the P now, these are nearly 50 year old cameras after all.
as a user it won't do anything more for you.
the finders on the VIT/VIL seem to have more internal flare than the P now, these are nearly 50 year old cameras after all.
Bingley
Veteran
I use a Bessa R w/ a Canon P for a 50/35 combo. Usually the 35 goes on the R (easier to see framelines), and the 50 goes on the P (ditto). An additional advantage to this set-up is lighter weight than two Canon rf bodies.
That said, if I found a nice user L1, I might go for it....
That said, if I found a nice user L1, I might go for it....
I'm finding that I prefer the finder of the P over the VI-T. The 50mm framelines are easy to see with glasses on the P, no so on the VI-T. Both finders are first rate, I had the VI-T CLA'd recently.
raid
Dad Photographer
I once had the VI-L [mint] and the P [user].
I traded the VI-L against a Leica camera and I kept [using] the Canon P.
I traded the VI-L against a Leica camera and I kept [using] the Canon P.
conradyiu
closer
Steve, Bessa seems a good choice, any recommendation in R2 or R3?
Bingley
Veteran
Conrad -- I have not used either the R2 or R3, but the R2 is the one that has 35mm framelines (if you're thinking in terms of a 35/50 kit). Both are M mount (as you probably know), but your Canon 35s will work just fine w/ an adapter. An R2 (or R) and a Canon 35/2.8 would be a terrific combination, IMO: compact, good blend of vintage look (from the lens) and modern metering and vf (from the camera body).
Bill58
Native Texan
Wouldn't another Model P make more sense from an investment point of view than any Bessa?
Bingley
Veteran
Wouldn't another Model P make more sense from an investment point of view than any Bessa?
Possibly, although my impression is that P prices (in the U.S. at least) have dropped over the last couple of years.
Bill -- How do you like using your Canon L1 with a 35mm lens, compared to the P? Would an L1 be a better option for the OP?
Kim Coxon
Moderator
I still partially regret selling my VI-L's. I also had a P. For me, the VI-L was a better camera mainly due to the variable mag finder. With a 50, the 1:1 finder is a joy to use with both eyes open. How much that is worth to you is something only you can decide.
Kim
Kim
Sam N
Well-known
The R3 has a 1:1 finder as well. However, it's not much use if you're left-eyed like myself.
Get an R2A. A camera with AE would be a nice compliment to your P.
Get an R2A. A camera with AE would be a nice compliment to your P.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.