radiocemetery
Well-known
Hi evil SLR users,
Have been trying to find more info. on the Helios 44 series of lenses. Is the Helios 44 the M42 equivalent of the Jupiter 8 in an SLR mount? I am thinking about getting one for my Spotmatic. Anyone use this combination? Results? One final question is there a web site that sorts out the different versions of the Helios 44 as far as coatings, "auto-man. function", and other differences?
Thanks, Steve
Have been trying to find more info. on the Helios 44 series of lenses. Is the Helios 44 the M42 equivalent of the Jupiter 8 in an SLR mount? I am thinking about getting one for my Spotmatic. Anyone use this combination? Results? One final question is there a web site that sorts out the different versions of the Helios 44 as far as coatings, "auto-man. function", and other differences?
Thanks, Steve
GeneW
Veteran
I'm no expert on them, but I think the Helios 44 is probably more akin to the Helios 103 on Kiev RF's than the J-8. I have a 44M that I used on a Bessaflex (M42 mount) and it's one of the nicest 50's I've seen. Very smooth oof areas, lots of personality in the lens. For awhile I also had a 44M-6 that was equally as good optically, but didn't have the A/M switch that the 44-M had. I think this lens went through 6 or 7 generations, up until fairly recently. It was the standard issue 50 on many a Zenit and some of the later ones have "Zenit" as well as "Helios" printed on the lens housing.radiocemetery said:Hi evil SLR users,
Have been trying to find more info. on the Helios 44 series of lenses. Is the Helios 44 the M42 equivalent of the Jupiter 8 in an SLR mount? I am thinking about getting one for my Spotmatic. Anyone use this combination? Results? One final question is there a web site that sorts out the different versions of the Helios 44 as far as coatings, "auto-man. function", and other differences?
Thanks, Steve
They're inexpensive, and sometimes other photographers will give you one they have in the closet. Well worth trying to see if you like them. I believe they're actually 58mm f/2. They're fairly large & heavy for a 50 and I seem to recall they take 55mm filters.
Gene
Last edited:
Welsh_Italian
Established
AFAIK, the Helios 44 is a copy of the Zeiss Biogon. I have some shots taken with this lens and a Pentax DSLR at http://flickr.com/search/?q=helios&w=26096406%40N00
shadowfox
Darkroom printing lives
Almost correct, the Helios 44 is a Russian lens based on the Carl Zeiss Jena Biotar 58/2.
This is what a Biotar looks like:
This is what a Biotar looks like:

radiocemetery
Well-known
Thanks for the responses.
Gene, I had noticed there was quite a proliferation of this lens and so there are some that have the auto-man function. That is good to know.
Al, the Stargazer photo. in your gallery really defines well what I am looking for, nice work and thanks.
Will, now you have given me an excuse to find that Biotar with a Praktica lens cap!
Research continues, Steve
Gene, I had noticed there was quite a proliferation of this lens and so there are some that have the auto-man function. That is good to know.
Al, the Stargazer photo. in your gallery really defines well what I am looking for, nice work and thanks.
Will, now you have given me an excuse to find that Biotar with a Praktica lens cap!
Research continues, Steve
Share: