bo_lorentzen
Established
Full disclousure, I posted this on LUF, and got a series of polite comments about how lovely the pictures is.... But nobody remotely touched on the concept of revisiting images, which I think is the far more interesting topic, I realize that I have been doing this for a long time.
Last year I scanned my grandfathers negatives from 1920-1990ish and discovered that over the years he would revisit the same images, new locations but same "image" with same treatment, same composition with same foreground and background treatments. He did that as a young man, during the war, and with his grand-children.
Lately as I have been scanning old negatives, key-wording them in LightRoom, this is starting to become more clear to me. I find a distinct thread in my treatment of portraits, etc.
I'm not saying this is a bad thing. Just trying to understand what is going on here.
The question:
Do you guys do this..?
Do the images improve over time..?
Or is this a scary sign of not really "seeing" anything new..?
Oslo 1988 Pentax 645 on velvia
New York 2009 M8 28mm
Hong Kong 2010 M9 35mm
Maybe there is counseling for this. 😀
Last year I scanned my grandfathers negatives from 1920-1990ish and discovered that over the years he would revisit the same images, new locations but same "image" with same treatment, same composition with same foreground and background treatments. He did that as a young man, during the war, and with his grand-children.
Lately as I have been scanning old negatives, key-wording them in LightRoom, this is starting to become more clear to me. I find a distinct thread in my treatment of portraits, etc.
I'm not saying this is a bad thing. Just trying to understand what is going on here.
The question:
Do you guys do this..?
Do the images improve over time..?
Or is this a scary sign of not really "seeing" anything new..?
Oslo 1988 Pentax 645 on velvia
New York 2009 M8 28mm
Hong Kong 2010 M9 35mm
Maybe there is counseling for this. 😀