BNF
Established
The Zeiss Ikon has been peaking my attention more and more. (Fogiel and his work plays a substantial role in this interest too.)
However... if I remember correctly, when I had my M gear (.72), I found that my 135 TE APO and 90 AA were my 2nd and 3rd most used lenses - when my 28 wasn't glued to the body that is....
So, when considereing the Ikon and a nice selection of ZM lenses (21, 35/2, 50/2), which 90 should I choose? The Lanthar at c490US (plus 170US for the finder, no?) seems like an obvious choice.... the 90 Elmarits are mostly 2x that price...
Or, quite frankly, should a forget the Ikon and go for a used M? I'll restate that previously my M and 28 lived together 70% of the time... When buying a new Ikon kit, I think the 21 and 35 are a great combination and compromise instead of one 28.
Any ideas?
However... if I remember correctly, when I had my M gear (.72), I found that my 135 TE APO and 90 AA were my 2nd and 3rd most used lenses - when my 28 wasn't glued to the body that is....
So, when considereing the Ikon and a nice selection of ZM lenses (21, 35/2, 50/2), which 90 should I choose? The Lanthar at c490US (plus 170US for the finder, no?) seems like an obvious choice.... the 90 Elmarits are mostly 2x that price...
Or, quite frankly, should a forget the Ikon and go for a used M? I'll restate that previously my M and 28 lived together 70% of the time... When buying a new Ikon kit, I think the 21 and 35 are a great combination and compromise instead of one 28.
Any ideas?