kshapero
South Florida Man
memories....it went to Mexico with me in '83 and then again to Japan in '84.
http://www.rokkorfiles.com/7SII.htm
http://www.rokkorfiles.com/7SII.htm
Fawley
Well-known
I have always wanted one of these, but other people want them too and they usually go for higher prices than I am willing to pay. The Hi-Matics are nice cameras but a little large. I imagine that the 7SII is a great camera but in a smaller, better looking package.
benlees
Well-known
I have always wanted one of these, but other people want them too and they usually go for higher prices than I am willing to pay. The Hi-Matics are nice cameras but a little large. I imagine that the 7SII is a great camera but in a smaller, better looking package.
I wanted one as well. Every time I got a hankering for one (black of course!) the prices always stopped me. Got a Vivitar 35ES for $50 instead. Sadly, I left it in my glove box and it was stolen! Great lens on it.
SolaresLarrave
My M5s need red dots!
My very first non-SLR camera was a Minolta G (intuitive focus, decent meter), which of course made me wish for one of these. Again, prices were a turn-off. However, I did get a Canonet instead and history (my own) took an entirely different course... 
However... I'll take a peek at the sales of this camera.
However... I'll take a peek at the sales of this camera.
Moto-Uno
Moto-Uno
The Hi-Matic's that you're referring to must be a lot larger than my Hi-Matic E, as this camera is about as small a camera that my hands can hold!It's certainly a lovely camera though..
regards,Peter
regards,Peter
Fawley
Well-known
The Hi-Matic's that you're referring to must be a lot larger than my Hi-Matic E, as this camera is about as small a camera that my hands can hold!It's certainly a lovely camera though..
regards,Peter
I have two Hi-Matic 7s, they get a fair amount of use but I do find them on the large side. I have always thought that a 7SII is more the size of a Canonet QL-17 which is a much easier camera to pack around.
Dirk
Privatier
I've had a 7sII and it was very well made. Overall, I prefer the Hi-Matic E. I think the lens is better and it has automatic parallax compensation.
teamsc10190
Established
memories....it went to Mexico with me in '83 and then again to Japan in '84.
http://www.rokkorfiles.com/7SII.htm
I have two of them and think it's a terrific camera with a great lens. I had purchased a silver one for my brother for a wedding gift in the late 70's that has come back to me recently, and a black one that I bought for myself in the early 80's.
Only shortcomings I've found are the small viewfinder with small, dim focus patch, wobbly lens barrel and the fact that manual exposure is un-metered.
All-in-all a very desirable rangefinder that is easy to operate, looks great, and most importantly takes great pictures.
clachnacuddin
Established
I bought one of these used for £25 in 1988 totally unaware of the camera's quality, I was delighted when I started using it of course and kept it for years, I eventually sold it for spare parts for over £100 after I fell on top of it onto a granite wall!
axas
Newbie
I'll ad my praise and a picture. It was taken through the window of a moving train but still came out pretty nice and I think shows a little the magic of this camera.

sPrättigau usm Bähnlifeischtr by xtothel, on Flickr

sPrättigau usm Bähnlifeischtr by xtothel, on Flickr
shadowfox
Darkroom printing lives
That scene above is begging for a large format negative. Beautiful!
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.