infinitydreams
Established
I want to get a digital camera that is quality, looks great and produces great results and isn't a standard DSLR (got one of those).
I've seen mixed reviews now for the X100 from "wow it's amazing" to "why I sold my x100" posts.
In the UK the X100 is now available for £850 which to me is still alot of money but I'll always pay for quality.
Is the only other something like the Leica X1 or are there other options?
Could they replace the X100 with a new model anytime soon? They've obviously just released the X10 and I've seen posts about a fancy interchangeable lens version but is there a X100 V2 on it's way?
I've seen mixed reviews now for the X100 from "wow it's amazing" to "why I sold my x100" posts.
In the UK the X100 is now available for £850 which to me is still alot of money but I'll always pay for quality.
Is the only other something like the Leica X1 or are there other options?
Could they replace the X100 with a new model anytime soon? They've obviously just released the X10 and I've seen posts about a fancy interchangeable lens version but is there a X100 V2 on it's way?
It IS an amazing camera. Over 70,000 sold... so there will be some reported issues on the internet...as with any camera sold in this quantity. You can choose to be scared or you can choose to buy the camera and have fun using it (it is under warranty). You will not see a new X100 until after the LX and then also maybe never.
paulfish4570
Veteran
i am amazed by mine. pics in my x100 gallery here, if you've mind to look, and in an x100 photo thread here at RFF.
gavinlg
Veteran
Yeah it's probably the best digital camera released in the last few years (IMO).
Don't expect to shoot it manual focus, don't expect it to focus in darkness with no contrast for it to lock on to, and expect the lens to behave like a 35mm f2.8 in terms of 'look' compared to a full frame camera.
Don't expect to shoot it manual focus, don't expect it to focus in darkness with no contrast for it to lock on to, and expect the lens to behave like a 35mm f2.8 in terms of 'look' compared to a full frame camera.
sar-photo
Simon Robinson
Hi James.
The X100 is my first digital camera. I held off going digital as I don't like SLRs and I do like optical viewfinders. I must say that I am very impressed with it. It does have its quirks but once you get to know it it is a fantastic little camera.
It is the only camera I have used since buying it about 6 months ago. I mostly take photos in the street and I find it ideal for this. All but one of the photos on my 24hourphoto blog were taken on the X100.
Cheers
Simon
The X100 is my first digital camera. I held off going digital as I don't like SLRs and I do like optical viewfinders. I must say that I am very impressed with it. It does have its quirks but once you get to know it it is a fantastic little camera.
It is the only camera I have used since buying it about 6 months ago. I mostly take photos in the street and I find it ideal for this. All but one of the photos on my 24hourphoto blog were taken on the X100.
Cheers
Simon
infinitydreams
Established
Well I think I'm sold. I now just need to find a little extra money to go and buy one...not sure santa will be that generous this year!
Is the lens hood critical? I also saw a post saying it's really important to get a super fast memory card or there is a huge delay between taking a photo and it being ready to go again?
Is the lens hood critical? I also saw a post saying it's really important to get a super fast memory card or there is a huge delay between taking a photo and it being ready to go again?
BillBingham2
Registered User
ID,
Technology timing is a continual nightmare and will be for years. I went the GRD direction with a CV brightline finder on top and love it. While the IQ might not be the same it that were an issue for me I might look GXR as an alternative to the X100. I find the Black Metal Brightline from CV (28mm) to look very good on top of a GRD.
One way several people look at trying new cameras is to purchase it and try it for a month. If you do not like it sell it and look at you loss, which should will be minor (15%), as a rental fee.
I'm not sure you will see a new X100 soon I do suspect in 2012 it might have a "Big Brother" though what that might be is just speculation.
B2
Technology timing is a continual nightmare and will be for years. I went the GRD direction with a CV brightline finder on top and love it. While the IQ might not be the same it that were an issue for me I might look GXR as an alternative to the X100. I find the Black Metal Brightline from CV (28mm) to look very good on top of a GRD.
One way several people look at trying new cameras is to purchase it and try it for a month. If you do not like it sell it and look at you loss, which should will be minor (15%), as a rental fee.
I'm not sure you will see a new X100 soon I do suspect in 2012 it might have a "Big Brother" though what that might be is just speculation.
B2
Vobluda
Well-known
Try the focusing first.
Yes, lot of units sold worldwide but also lot of the units available second hand..
Yes, lot of units sold worldwide but also lot of the units available second hand..
Vobluda
Well-known
Olympus EP-3 with Panasonic 20mm is also an option worth considering.
v_roma
Well-known
+1. I own one and love it. You certainly won't have anything to worry about as far as image quality but you may want to check if you can work with the focus.
Jeez, the AF on the X100 is not that bad at all. Stop scaring people... ever tried the Leica X1? The X100's AF is blazing fast in comparison. As far as MF? It's an afterthought and not the primary focusing style for the X100.
Mr_Toad
Fluffy Marsupial
Have you considered the FujiFilm X10? ...the little brother of the X100. It's new, so there are risks....and are on backorder in many shops...but can be purchased for $599 US. $699 US if you are impatient.
It seems that, with the X10, Fuji kinda corrected some usability challenges with the X100.
I'm sure the X100 is much more camera, though. ...just a thought.
It seems that, with the X10, Fuji kinda corrected some usability challenges with the X100.
I'm sure the X100 is much more camera, though. ...just a thought.
Shade
Well-known
Its an amazing camera, has some quibbles though. They are releasing an interchangeable version next year supposedly. Or you can also get an ep3, i love mine.
willie_901
Veteran
The image quality, especially in low light, is superior to any camera with a smaller sensor.
A fast memory card is a must. I use two Sandisk Extreme Pro 8 GB cards. I also use a lens hood. Any amount of flare is undesirable and the hood also protects the lens. I never use a filter as the lens rear element is very close to the sensor and any source for reflections is to be avoided. If you shoot a lot of frames in a day, I would purchase a second battery.
As others have mentioned the X100 is an automatic focus camera. Manual focus ( rotating the lens collar) is only useful to make fine adjustments. Manual focus mode is really just a different and more convenient way to use autofocus . I usually focus and recompose and my selection of M or AF focus modes depends on what I'm photographing.
For most people the learning curve is steep (it was for me). Once you figure out how to operate the camera to match your needs, all is well. The lens performs best at F 4. The weakest part of the system is flare due to gross over exposure of point-source lights in scenes with where high dynamic range is important (night scenes). Otherwise the sensor tolerates over exposure much better than most digital cameras I've used.
A fast memory card is a must. I use two Sandisk Extreme Pro 8 GB cards. I also use a lens hood. Any amount of flare is undesirable and the hood also protects the lens. I never use a filter as the lens rear element is very close to the sensor and any source for reflections is to be avoided. If you shoot a lot of frames in a day, I would purchase a second battery.
As others have mentioned the X100 is an automatic focus camera. Manual focus ( rotating the lens collar) is only useful to make fine adjustments. Manual focus mode is really just a different and more convenient way to use autofocus . I usually focus and recompose and my selection of M or AF focus modes depends on what I'm photographing.
For most people the learning curve is steep (it was for me). Once you figure out how to operate the camera to match your needs, all is well. The lens performs best at F 4. The weakest part of the system is flare due to gross over exposure of point-source lights in scenes with where high dynamic range is important (night scenes). Otherwise the sensor tolerates over exposure much better than most digital cameras I've used.
infinitydreams
Established
I really like the idea of the X100 because of it's fixed lens. My photos are always better when I don't have access to ZOOOOOM
Like what?
gavinlg
Veteran
Agreed, the AF isn't far off a modern prosumer DSLR. It's a little tiny bit slower, and is single shot AF only, center point only. Otherwise it's quite good, and very accurate.
Yeah, even comparable to my 5d in terms of IQ. On a different planet to m4/3 in low light and with dynamic range.
Out to Lunch
Ventor
You could always consider buying a second-hand Epson R-D1, R-D1s, or R-D1x.
rbelyell
Well-known
couldnt agree more with gavin's comments. found funny the comment it has trouble focusing in NO light where NO high contrast subject is available. really? what camera doesnt have trouble focusing in those conditions--PEOPLE have trouble manual focusing like that.
AF is just fine--set it to MF, press the AFL button to achieve accurate focus 95% of the time, use MF ring with subject magnification for the other 5%.
daytime IQ the equal of my 5d with zeiss legacy glass; lowlight/high iso IQ beats 5d hands down (i traded my 5d for the x100). i have and really like an olly ep2 with evf and the panny 20/1.7--but its no contest, its not in the same league as the x100, and is really unuseable above iso 800. x100 fabulous even at 3200.
AF is just fine--set it to MF, press the AFL button to achieve accurate focus 95% of the time, use MF ring with subject magnification for the other 5%.
daytime IQ the equal of my 5d with zeiss legacy glass; lowlight/high iso IQ beats 5d hands down (i traded my 5d for the x100). i have and really like an olly ep2 with evf and the panny 20/1.7--but its no contest, its not in the same league as the x100, and is really unuseable above iso 800. x100 fabulous even at 3200.
celluloidprop
Well-known
I've only got three knocks on it - it does seem somewhat fragile (purely a feelings, I've had no actual issues with it), the buffer is slow even with a UHS-1 card (but not unusable) and the filter ring/hood setup is terrible. I'd really like a locking bayonet hood for it, but there are no real elegant solutions.
Other than that, fantastic camera.
I use mine 99% of the time with the EVF, with the AF focus point at its smallest setting and use the same focus and recompose method I do with every other camera, whether rangefinder, dSLR or manual focus SLR.
Other than that, fantastic camera.
I use mine 99% of the time with the EVF, with the AF focus point at its smallest setting and use the same focus and recompose method I do with every other camera, whether rangefinder, dSLR or manual focus SLR.