haagen_dazs
Well-known
just wondering, is there a 40mm lens that is good bang for buck?
=)
decent to good optics that wont blow a hold in the pocket?
=)
decent to good optics that wont blow a hold in the pocket?
FrankS
Registered User
40mm in LTM? Nope. (edit added: not to my knowledge.)
The closest you'll find in a high bang for the buck lens wider than 50mm is a J12 which is a 35mm lens, but it won't fit all cameras because of its bulbous rear element.
The closest you'll find in a high bang for the buck lens wider than 50mm is a J12 which is a 35mm lens, but it won't fit all cameras because of its bulbous rear element.
Last edited:
pbjbike
Established
Wasn't there an LTM Rokkor 40mm? Someone here posted a heads up for one up for auction in the last 2 weeks, or was it the 45....
back alley
IMAGES
FrankS said:40mm in LTM? Nope. (edit added: not to my knowledge.)
The closest you'll find in a high bang for the buck lens wider than 50mm is a J12 which is a 35mm lens, but it won't fit all cameras because of its bulbous rear element.
i like that word...bulbous.
everyone say it out loud...!
taffer
void
There's a 45/2.8 Rokkor for the old Minolta LTM cameras, they *sometimes* can be had cheap, the last ones I bid on I lost for a lot of money. Performance wise I can't really speak of (haven't tried or seen anything)
Then there's the Rollei Sonnar 40/2.8, seems to be a very good lens but not easy to have cheap.
And also a very rare Olympus 40/2.8 (I think), which usually goes for an arm and a leg.
I was in the same position as you some months ago, and ended giving up and getting a M mount camera and a 40/2 Summicron
Say what? Bulbous ?
Then there's the Rollei Sonnar 40/2.8, seems to be a very good lens but not easy to have cheap.
And also a very rare Olympus 40/2.8 (I think), which usually goes for an arm and a leg.
I was in the same position as you some months ago, and ended giving up and getting a M mount camera and a 40/2 Summicron
Say what? Bulbous ?
awilder
Alan Wilder
Sure. It's the 40/2.8 Rollei Sonnar HFT. Was available new from Rollei/CV in LTM (consitent with the CV philosophy in most of their current rf lenses) and it also included the Leica M adaptor ring to boot. I normally use it on my Minolta CLE. Very sharp and contrasty and compares favorably with other modern 40's but with that Zeiss fingerprint similar to the Rollei 35 S/SE or the Contax T/T2.
Last edited:
bmattock
Veteran
Use a 50. Back up three paces. Shazam - a 40mm.
You're welcome - no charge for this one.
Best Regards,
Bill Mattocks
You're welcome - no charge for this one.
Best Regards,
Bill Mattocks
flashover
John K
back alley said:i like that word...bulbous.
everyone say it out loud...!
Dirty old man
FrankS
Registered User
I stand corrected sitting at my keyboard! It's good to learn something new every day. Thank you Oscar and awilder! 
bmattock
Veteran
FrankS said:I stand corrected sitting at my keyboard! It's good to learn something new every day. Thank you Oscar and awilder!![]()
Oscar Wilde? Seems a bit more than co-inky-dink.
back alley
IMAGES
taffer
void
Groan...
You're welcome Frank, just like Bill's good advice above, it comes free of charge
Well, back to work I go, snif.
Oscar, a wild.
You're welcome Frank, just like Bill's good advice above, it comes free of charge
Well, back to work I go, snif.
Oscar, a wild.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.