"I'm Back" 16MP digital back
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/samellos/im-backtm-pro-low-cost-digital-back-for-35mm-analo
I like the idea,
but the prototype seems to be a bit clunky in design with its large bulge on the back,
plus the relatively small 16MP will likely be met without much enthusiasm.
Stephen
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/samellos/im-backtm-pro-low-cost-digital-back-for-35mm-analo
I like the idea,
but the prototype seems to be a bit clunky in design with its large bulge on the back,
plus the relatively small 16MP will likely be met without much enthusiasm.
Stephen
CMur12
Veteran
I've been hoping for something like this for a long time. However, I'm not sure how well the unit will fit 35mm cameras of different sizes and, even more importantly, with that big appendage on the back, one couldn't really use the camera's eye-level finder.
- Murray
- Murray
Huss
Veteran
Cool now we can use those neat old film cameras to take cat pictures.
BillBingham2
Registered User
Reminds me of the Marty Forscher back for Polaroids some years back.
It's a great solid first step. Not for me, but it's a very interesting approach. I can see it more on a MF camera.
Interesting that we are seeing more photography focused kickstarters, wonder what will be next?
Thanks for the heads up SG!
B2 (;->
It's a great solid first step. Not for me, but it's a very interesting approach. I can see it more on a MF camera.
Interesting that we are seeing more photography focused kickstarters, wonder what will be next?
Thanks for the heads up SG!
B2 (;->
mooge
Well-known
It's a digital camera that takes a photo of the image projected onto a groundglass on the film plane of a film camera.
-Apertures larger than f/3,5 recommended to avoid vignetting
-shutter of film camera must be set to B and held for 2-3 seconds
-Apertures larger than f/3,5 recommended to avoid vignetting
-shutter of film camera must be set to B and held for 2-3 seconds
Corran
Well-known
It's also just a cellphone camera in the back unit. Funny how the Yashica Y35 gets panned hard but folks are salivating over this awkward conglomeration of parts. One only knows how you actually look through the viewfinder with a giant box sticking out the back of the camera. Have fun.
Arbitrarium
Well-known
Considering that guy who converted a Konica Auto S3 to have a digital back hardly added any bulk to the camera, this thing is just comically oversized. Why anyone would want to walk around with this abomination rather than just adapt old lenses to their digital camera is beyond me.
Bille
Well-known
The concept of digital backs for film cameras is obsolete since the Sony a7.
Archlich
Well-known
The concept of digital backs for film cameras is obsolete since the Sony a7.
If only it were as simple and intuitive to use as a...you name it.
The Nikon Df could be like that, but they were too afraid to dive into the niche.
squirrel$$$bandit
Veteran
An A7 feels much more like your old camera than grafting your old camera onto this crazy thing would.
x-ray
Veteran
That's exactly what I was thinking. I can't imagine the image quality being very good capturing the final image off a ground glass or focusing screen. I used some of these early cameras and have no desire to go back to the bulk and terrible quality.
No thanks, we've moved way beyond this.
DanskDynamit
Well-known
"a second chance for your analog 35mm camera"
(facepalm)
(facepalm)
Huss
Veteran
"a second chance for your analog 35mm camera"
(facepalm)
yeah, it's called buying a roll of film and using it.
Yep, just use film... and you could probably have better results scanning it with your cell phone.
ruby.monkey
Veteran
If only it were as simple and intuitive to use as a...you name it.
The Nikon Df could be like that, but they were too afraid to dive into the niche.
I can't say I've found working a power switch and then turning a shutter-speed control dial to be too taxing mentally. If you can work a Nikon F80 - Hell, if you can walk and chew gum at the same time - you can work a Sony A7 with a manually-operated lens.
JoeLopez
Well-known
"I'm Back" 16MP digital back
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/samellos/im-backtm-pro-low-cost-digital-back-for-35mm-analo
I like the idea,
but the prototype seems to be a bit clunky in design with its large bulge on the back,
plus the relatively small 16MP will likely be met without much enthusiasm.
Stephen
I've read about the previous progress, such a great tool! I'd love to have one. The video has that great vintage look and feel!
mich rassena
Well-known
That's a very rough prototype. It looks like the controller just remote controls a VNC session. You can see it in the demo where the user just moves a mouse cursor around to launch an app. Is this just a Raspberry PI with a camera module under the hood?
Photographing a ground glass gets around the problem of the crop sensor giving you a full field of view. That's good. But in the video there's a lot of vignetting. The real problem is the requirement to use bulb mode. Certainly there's a way to create a circuit which triggers the SPI ports on the PI with the PC or hot shoe flash sync, and use that signal to tell the PI to capture from the onboard camera. Then at least you can actually use the shutter, however limited that might be.
Don't get me wrong, it's a neat hack, but the form factor of the Kodak DCS 420 is long out of fashion. This design is too little, too late. There's a long way to go from this demonstration to an actual product.
Photographing a ground glass gets around the problem of the crop sensor giving you a full field of view. That's good. But in the video there's a lot of vignetting. The real problem is the requirement to use bulb mode. Certainly there's a way to create a circuit which triggers the SPI ports on the PI with the PC or hot shoe flash sync, and use that signal to tell the PI to capture from the onboard camera. Then at least you can actually use the shutter, however limited that might be.
Don't get me wrong, it's a neat hack, but the form factor of the Kodak DCS 420 is long out of fashion. This design is too little, too late. There's a long way to go from this demonstration to an actual product.
Dralowid
Michael
What was the digital back for the Leica R series called and did anyone actually use one?
Luke_Miller
Established
What was the digital back for the Leica R series called and did anyone actually use one?
I believe it was called the DMR. And Kodak did something similar with the DCS 6xx/7xx series using Nikon F5 film bodies.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.