venchka
Veteran
In the "Boring Landscape" thread I promised to waste film at Thanksgiving shooting landscapes. I also bought my first box of Kodak ULTRA 400UC at Wal-Mart for this occasion. I bracketed most shots at ISO 100-200-400. All exposures worked well. I am very pleasantly surprised with the results from this film. Several 400 exposures were the best of the 3.
Thanks for looking. All comments welcome and appreciated.
Cheers!
Thanks for looking. All comments welcome and appreciated.
Cheers!
Attachments
RayPA
Ignore It (It'll go away)
nice. I'm surprised by your results and the subtly of the color. I usually get more saturation with 400UC (my favorite color film), but then again I don't shoot a lot of color nature landscapes. nice shots.
venchka
Veteran
Thank you.
Perhaps it is the scanning process. I didn't do anything to these with Lightroom. As I recall, the leaves and berries were +0, the pumpkins -1 (I should have used the polarizer here), the full tree +0 & the last is +1. All metered with my Canon Elan IIE with ISO set to 200.
Perhaps it is the scanning process. I didn't do anything to these with Lightroom. As I recall, the leaves and berries were +0, the pumpkins -1 (I should have used the polarizer here), the full tree +0 & the last is +1. All metered with my Canon Elan IIE with ISO set to 200.
kaiyen
local man of mystery
Well, the (relative) overexposure will decrease saturation, so that might explain it along with the scanning process. Nice work.
allan
allan
venchka
Veteran
Thank you.
Why trust my memory, hey?
These are in order: 0, -1, +1, ISO 200. I'm sure the cement driveway fooled the meter. They all look overexposed.
Why trust my memory, hey?
These are in order: 0, -1, +1, ISO 200. I'm sure the cement driveway fooled the meter. They all look overexposed.
Attachments
Last edited:
venchka
Veteran
retrocam
Too many 50mms
The colors in your pics look natural. Nice.
I also like Kodak UC 400 or 100. In this sample, I scanned at 600dpi and downsized for the web.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/retrocam/242086088/
I also like Kodak UC 400 or 100. In this sample, I scanned at 600dpi and downsized for the web.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/retrocam/242086088/
RayPA
Ignore It (It'll go away)
retrocam said:The colors in your pics look natural. Nice.
I also like Kodak UC 400 or 100. In this sample, I scanned at 600dpi and downsized for the web.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/retrocam/242086088/
I agree. I rate UC at the box, but I think it's better to do like you do, Wayne, and overexpose it a some.
Nice shot, annie.
.
venchka
Veteran
Ultra 100UC
Ultra 100UC
I forgot all about this roll of ULTRA 100UC. My first with the 50mm DR Summicron. Box speed I think. Possibly ISO 80, but no slower.
The link to the larger original....
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/venchka/backyard/FH000020.jpg.html
I wish the ULTRA 100UC were easier to find.
Ultra 100UC
I forgot all about this roll of ULTRA 100UC. My first with the 50mm DR Summicron. Box speed I think. Possibly ISO 80, but no slower.

The link to the larger original....
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/venchka/backyard/FH000020.jpg.html
I wish the ULTRA 100UC were easier to find.
jtm
not a moose
The 100UC is easy to mail order, at least.
venchka
Veteran
One more 100UC
One more 100UC
Yes it is. That's about the only place I can find it.
One more with ULTRA 100UC. I think you would have to look at large prints from the 100 & 400 to see any difference. I have to agree with those who say the that the 400UC has the grain of the 100UC. Or very close.
One more 100UC
jtm said:The 100UC is easy to mail order, at least.
Yes it is. That's about the only place I can find it.
One more with ULTRA 100UC. I think you would have to look at large prints from the 100 & 400 to see any difference. I have to agree with those who say the that the 400UC has the grain of the 100UC. Or very close.
Attachments
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.