Learning to use Color Filters for B&W photography

Pirate

Guitar playing Fotografer
Local time
4:18 AM
Joined
Sep 27, 2009
Messages
1,864
Location
Highland, Mi.
I'd like to start learning about the use of colored filters for Black and White photography.

I'm familiar with the basic effects: blocking a colour will darken that shade and make it closer to a black instead of a gray.

The color filter chosen for blocking a colour should be at the opposite end of the colour circle -- is this correct? Such as, to block Red and make the Reds come out darker in the photo, I would use a Blue/Green filter?

I'd like to learn the basics - the stuff I need to remember while thinking about how I want the picture to come out.

All help appreciated,
Thanks

P^)
 
I use color filters a lot. My basic filters are red (there are three types, red, deep red and opaque red), orange/yellow, green, blue. This leaves out color correcting filters which are made for color film, but can be misused for b&w effects, polarizers which do the same thing to b&w as they do to color, neutral density for aperture control, gradient for horizon mitigating, and a whole slew of special effects filters that do weird stuff.

Red (Wratten 25) makes most skies dramatic, makes feminine skin lighter and smoother and it hides blems. Red filters darken green (leaves, grass) and blue (sky, water), but lighten white and warmer colors like clouds and people. I often put a red filter on when I am shooting panchromatic film in daylight if I want a contrasty, dramatic look. A red filter dims light at midday by three f-stops.

Deep red (29) does what red does, but much more so. This is my filter of choice for IR film because I can see what I am shooting through a SLR. It comes very close to an opaque red (IR pass) filter with the old HIE film, and Efke's Aura film, but not with SFX. A deep red filter can reduce exposure by four or five stops, depending on the film and lighting (5 at midday, 4 in the late afternoon/early morning, or under incandescent light.)

Opaque red (89) is good with infrared or red sensitized film. Opaque red filters (actually not opaque, you can see the filament of a light bulb through one) usually add way too much contrast to normal b&w film, and are the filter most often used in digital infrared cameras. If you want the effect of white foliage with modern IR film, then an opaque red filter - or a deeper (#87, #93) is needed. Discover the filter factor by experimenting with your lighting, film and development.

Orange and yellow (#9, 12, 15 or 16) are similar to red, but they darken green foliage much less (except for infrared film, where they darken green more.) Orange adds a slight sense of added contrast, but yellow yields a very natural rendition of sunlight scenes. Under incandescent light (studio hot-lights included) a yellow filter adds brightness to skin, while downplaying most other colors. I often use a deep yellow filter (#9 or 12) (also known as a 'minus blue' filter) for feminine portraiture. It subtracts less than one f-stop of light from a given exposure, while an orange filter cuts one and a half to two stops.

Green (#58 or 61) will darken skin, especially ruddy, masculine skin. It will lighten (but not dramatically) foliage and leave sky and water looking normal. Green filters should not be used for feminine portraits intended to be flattering, as it will accentuate blotchiness, eye bags, wrinkles and blems. With men, these features add "character", so use one for those pictures of wizened faces of old men. Or of working men, or of anyone whose skin you wish to look darker. It'll take one to two stops away, depending on the subject.

Blue (#47, or the #80 series of light balancing filters for a milder effect) is a special effect filter. It adds haze, fog and other atmospheric effects, which increases with the humidity! It creates skin leisons , blems and blotches where none exist - it make zombies out of even the most beautiful people. And it adds contrast in almost uncontrollable amounts to landscapes - skies turn white, the ocean looks frothy, and bushes/trees become silhouettes. If you are into post-modern extrema, then this is the filter for you! Figure 4 or more stops are lost, depending on the effect you want.
 
Great write-up from Chris.

If you carry more than one lens at different filter sizes, your bag can get crowded with filters quickly. I mostly use red (25) and medium yellow, if at all; red for landscapes, yellow for female portraits. Different lenses react to filters a little differently.

If you have a scanner, shoot some color and play with "digital" filters. For example the Fredmiranda PS plug-in "BW Workflow Pro" lets you play with different filters on a given color scan.

Best,

Roland.
 
Last edited:
Blue (#47, or the #80 series of light balancing filters for a milder effect) is a special effect filter. It adds haze, fog and other atmospheric effects, which increases with the humidity! It creates skin leisons , blems and blotches where none exist - it make zombies out of even the most beautiful people. And it adds contrast in almost uncontrollable amounts to landscapes - skies turn white, the ocean looks frothy, and bushes/trees become silhouettes. If you are into post-modern extrema, then this is the filter for you! Figure 4 or more stops are lost, depending on the effect you want.

That's the most awesome description of blue filter if there ever was one. 🙂

Could I forward this set of descriptions to a friend who is getting into the filters for B&W mode ?
 
That's the most awesome description of blue filter if there ever was one. 🙂

Could I forward this set of descriptions to a friend who is getting into the filters for B&W mode ?

Heh! Absolutely. There is no need to credit me either. Several years ago I shot my brother with a #47 filter. He now does the old hand up obscuring his face thing whenever I point a camera at him.
 
Chris101, thank you for a VERY informative text on coloured filters. With rangefinder cameras I usually only use yellow or orange filter. With SLR I use a polariser instead of coloured filters for obvious reasons. For my TLR I have an extensive set of coloured filters and use them too (Thanks to Chris I now know how to use the blue one).
 
...

Red ... makes feminine skin lighter and smoother and it hides blems. ... A red filter dims light at midday by three f-stops.
...

Actually, it will make all skin somewhat lighter, whether male or female, white or black. Pimples will be lighter and therefore easier to retouch out if that is desired.
 
I think you have the most flexibility by shooting in color, then scanning and selecting the appropriate filter in filtered b/w with Picasa.

I did this with some portra 400NC C41, and have never seen more beautiful b/w filtered images.
 
But the object here is to learn "photography", not "digital re-touching". I can do the digital thing in Photoshop just as you described it and that's what makes me want to learn how to do it with film, so I don't need to do any (or minimal) retouching.

I use digital when I need it, but when it's for me and my memories, I prefer film.
 
Quite simply : a filter lighten its color, and darken its complementary (ies). The strenght of the filter is proportional to the amount of colour transmited / blocked.

So: anything but blue will darken the sky, a red will lighten the skin blemishes, but lipstick as well (so use blue). Green will enhance those blemishes (Yellow-Green to a lesser amount.)

It is very simple colour theory. Just add the fact that BW film has a different spectral sensitivity than the eye (modern films not that much, though; you don't really need a medium yellow as a standard filter anymore) and you are god to go.

Finally, many many many times, a sky that lack details need more of a burning than a filter with modern emulsions to be naturally looking. Use filters if you want a strong effect.
 
"Just add the fact that BW film has a different spectral sensitivity than the eye..."

This brings up another question I was going to tackle later, but it seems now might be a good time:

For people who are color blind, do these same rules apply in using filters for B&W photography?

My Step-Dad is colour blind .... long story.... so I'm curious if he could use colour filters to the same effect that we could.
 
Yes he could

Yes he could

The difference between using a filter or not, or a yellow vs green filter can mean the difference between seeing a shadow detail or not seeing it - as in being there, or not being there.



"Just add the fact that BW film has a different spectral sensitivity than the eye..."

This brings up another question I was going to tackle later, but it seems now might be a good time:

For people who are color blind, do these same rules apply in using filters for B&W photography?

My Step-Dad is colour blind .... long story.... so I'm curious if he could use colour filters to the same effect that we could.
 
Chris - excellent post. Learned something - thank you. I see a blue filter in my future. 🙂
To Pirate - suggest starting with a simple Y2 (Yellow 2) to bring out the blue in the sky and work your way to blue filter wackiness...
 
The difference between using a filter or not, or a yellow vs green filter can mean the difference between seeing a shadow detail or not seeing it - as in being there, or not being there.

Add the fact that the end result he will be looking at will be b/w, not color. The only problem might be in selecting the desired color filter. He might have to read the rim of the filter to ensure he has the one he wants. He also would not see the effect as we would when looking through the lens of an SLR.

But the final print is still going to be b/w. If he sees b/w normally, he will see the enhanced effect of the print.
 
Back
Top Bottom