M6 meter no longer repairable?

H

Huss

Veteran
Local time
3:40 PM
Joined
Sep 19, 2014
Messages
9,859
From this thread where there is a classic M6 for sale with broken meter:

https://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost-classifieds/showproduct.php?product=55177

"I tried to get the meter fixed but I was told that the parts are no longer available."

If this is indeed the case, then how 'in your opinion' does this affect the value/pricing of Leica film Ms. Because to me a camera without a meter (M4) is more attractive than a camera with a broken meter. Just because knowing that there is something broken on it bugs me!
 
My guess is that Stephen G's repair man just doesn't have the parts. Leica Japan told me last winter the M6 classic meter is repairable.
 
Maybe Leica is hoarding parts not selling them to independents. If true then it is as good as no parts given what they charge.
 
Last time I checked, M6 TTL meter was not reparable by Leica Camera AG anymore. No parts.
For how long Leica will supply another parts, nobody knows. Any film M is kind of gamble now.
 
Ko.Fe. "Any film M is kind of gamble now."
K, With so many in circulation, I don't think I'll ever have difficulty getting donor parts for my M4 or a replacement body, in my lifetime.....
 
My M3's meter never worked! Maybe this is why I use an external meter with this camera. :)
My M6 seems to be fine. The meter works.
 
Leica Japan may have a hord from years ago.

M6 meter parts have been not available for a long time.

Just shot a roll with Nikon F2 + Pentax digital spot meter I owned for 3 decades. Every frame perfect.
I get perfection with Sekonic Studio Deluxe also.

There is a learning curve with spot meters.
 
Deardorff38 said:
Ko.Fe. "Any film M is kind of gamble now."
K, With so many in circulation, I don't think I'll ever have difficulty getting donor parts for my M4 or a replacement body, in my lifetime.....
Click to expand...


Not so many film M are made. M4-2 only twelve thousands, for example.
And if camera is old it has worn out parts as well.

I'm also don't want to be on the Mad Max territory, it is all yours :)
 
Ko.Fe, Over 57,000 M4. Whenever i visit Japan i see lot's of them unused.
If i run out, I'll get an M2... that was my first Leica ..... 82,000 produced....pr even an M3 and use an SBL00.
To paraphrase from Treasures of the Sierra Madre: "Meter? I don't need no stinkin' meter" :)
BTW did you see the article on the completely worn-out & re-built M4

https://www.leica-camera.blog/2011/10/10/repair-of-a-legend/

Also, from all the Leicas i've owned & used, my latest M4 is the only one i ever sent for service....my experience with them finds them incredibly reliable.
 
Used? Like everyday and for couple of thousands exposures per year, at least? Or just "used"... Because if Leica is used for real, it will need service, parts once in a while.
82K is miniscular number, FED-2 is made in 2.000.000.
But using old cameras for spares, I have done it. It feels like cannibalizing....
 
Ko.Fe. said:
Used? Like everyday and for couple of thousands exposures per year, at least? Or just "used"... Because if Leica is used for real, it will need service, parts once in a while.
82K is miniscular number, FED-2 is made in 2.000.000.
But using old cameras for spares, I have done it. It feels like cannibalizing....
Click to expand...

You're right about the cannabalizing feel Ko.Fe.
Used? Well mostly i only had one camera at a time, & i was never a press photographer, but as a professional mountain climbing guide my Leica went everywhere with me, Alaska expeditions, Nepal, heli-skiing and ski- touring all winter long, climbing in the Alps. Dropped, bumped, bruised... so normal continuous use. And never needed service. That's my story.... & yes in estimate a couple of thousand exposures a year....
not camera collecting....

& Huss: "Because to me a camera without a meter (M4) is more attractive than a camera with a broken meter. Just because knowing that there is something broken on it bugs me!" I totally agree with you....
 
Deardorff38 said:
.......

& Huss: "Because to me a camera without a meter (M4) is more attractive than a camera with a broken meter. Just because knowing that there is something broken on it bugs me!" I totally agree with you....
Click to expand...


I agree. I have a Rollei 35S with a bung meter, unrepairable. Superb lens, everything else lovely, but having a crippled meter spoils the experience altogether. (but at least it is more usable than my bung Ricoh GV1v)
 
M6 meter no longer repairable?

Aren't meters comparatively simple things, so wouldn't it be possible for a reasonably motivated and talented person/team/whatever to design and manufacture a replacement? People are reverse engineering old computer boards and designing their own around old components and manufacturing new ones, multi-layer pcbs and surface mounted components, with short production runs of a few hundred. A meter seems surely simple by comparison. Not that I'd have a clue where to start myself of course.
 
Well, if M6 meter parts are not available, then what about the MP? Pretty much the same meter, no?
 
Ko.Fe. said:
Not so many film M are made. M4-2 only twelve thousands, for example.
And if camera is old it has worn out parts as well.

I'm also don't want to be on the Mad Max territory, it is all yours :)
Click to expand...

A mad max Leica M! There’s an interesting idea 🤓
 
Rob-F said:
Well, if M6 meter parts are not available, then what about the MP? Pretty much the same meter, no?
Click to expand...


Good question Rob.....i wonder what the answer is?

My limited experience is that not all repairmen have all the parts. When I was about to get my M4 serviced (& adapted for a Leicavit), I called Vancouver, then Kinderman in Toronto, then the Head bar keeper, then Youxin Ye. When I called Don Goldberg.... he had the parts. I understand the lack of parts for M7s and TTLs, but i'm sure someone has the parts to fix the standard M6 meter.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom