sf
Veteran
S
Socke
Guest
Since printing my photos is only a second or third thought with me I have the IP4000.
(Ok, I realy wanted the 5000 but they haven't had them in stock then)
Very nice printers, no head clogging like I have had with the Epsons. Paperhandling is close to a professional level with a cassete at the bottom and a sheet feeder on the top.
I had a look at the Epson R-800 lately and when asked the Epson rep. told me to flush inks once a week on their printers, when you're away from your Epson printer ask your naieghbour to do it while he waters your flowers
And the best thing, the older IP-x000 printers use ink cartridges without chips to prevent you from using third party inks. Unluckily Canon followed the lead of Epson and implemented a chipped cartridge in the IP-x200 series.
(Ok, I realy wanted the 5000 but they haven't had them in stock then)
Very nice printers, no head clogging like I have had with the Epsons. Paperhandling is close to a professional level with a cassete at the bottom and a sheet feeder on the top.
I had a look at the Epson R-800 lately and when asked the Epson rep. told me to flush inks once a week on their printers, when you're away from your Epson printer ask your naieghbour to do it while he waters your flowers
And the best thing, the older IP-x000 printers use ink cartridges without chips to prevent you from using third party inks. Unluckily Canon followed the lead of Epson and implemented a chipped cartridge in the IP-x200 series.
sf
Veteran
Socke said:
seems like an antitrust violation. . .or some kind of law being streched to the point of breakage.