lukx
Well-known
Hi all, I have two black rim Nikkors that I am trying to make one nice and one bargain lens out of.
One lens (#729...) has nice mechanics, a good clean barrel, and is modded for 0.7m coupled focusing. But it has some internal coating issues and some semi bad wipe marks front and back. This lens is a good performer stopped down but is quite soft and glowy wide open. I suspect the defects in the glass contribute to that to some extent. The other (#760...) has okay focus mechanics that need a CLA, is not focus modded, has a less nice cosmetic appearance, but much nicer glass.
I would like to enjoy the best of both worlds if you will and merge them into my perfect little Japan-Sonnar.
SO: I found that, while looking identical when comparing the lens blocks and mounts, the lenses have different shims installed.
The first lens (#729... with good mechanics) has two shims stacked, one 1.24mm, one 0.31mm, for a combined 1.55mm. I found that this combination achieves good focus accuracy on my Leica at f2.8 with the originally installed, faulty glass. The other lens (with the nice optics) came with just one shim of 1.35mm. So a total of 0.2mm difference. So far this lens is not film tested on my Leica.
If my studies of Brian Sweeney's work on Sonnars have taught me anything, such a difference would result in a substantial amount of focus discrepancy when applied falsely.
MY QUESTIONS to the experts:
(Obviously whatever I do I will ultimately need to try it on my Leica anyway, but I am looking for a good educated guess to start with.)
Would you say I should swap shims when swapping optics blocks, or should the shims stay with the mount?
Does anyone have any experience with the shims in these lenses? How much variation was there?
Are my thoughts moot, because shims are chosen for a distinct combination of optics and focus mount, with too many possible combinations?
I have a digital Fuji I can test with, or film test with my Leica. No digital Leica with live view available. I would prefer to not tear the optics units apart and swap all elements from one housing to another. So trying that would be my last resort.
Thanks in advance
Lukas
One lens (#729...) has nice mechanics, a good clean barrel, and is modded for 0.7m coupled focusing. But it has some internal coating issues and some semi bad wipe marks front and back. This lens is a good performer stopped down but is quite soft and glowy wide open. I suspect the defects in the glass contribute to that to some extent. The other (#760...) has okay focus mechanics that need a CLA, is not focus modded, has a less nice cosmetic appearance, but much nicer glass.
I would like to enjoy the best of both worlds if you will and merge them into my perfect little Japan-Sonnar.
SO: I found that, while looking identical when comparing the lens blocks and mounts, the lenses have different shims installed.
The first lens (#729... with good mechanics) has two shims stacked, one 1.24mm, one 0.31mm, for a combined 1.55mm. I found that this combination achieves good focus accuracy on my Leica at f2.8 with the originally installed, faulty glass. The other lens (with the nice optics) came with just one shim of 1.35mm. So a total of 0.2mm difference. So far this lens is not film tested on my Leica.
If my studies of Brian Sweeney's work on Sonnars have taught me anything, such a difference would result in a substantial amount of focus discrepancy when applied falsely.
MY QUESTIONS to the experts:
(Obviously whatever I do I will ultimately need to try it on my Leica anyway, but I am looking for a good educated guess to start with.)
Would you say I should swap shims when swapping optics blocks, or should the shims stay with the mount?
Does anyone have any experience with the shims in these lenses? How much variation was there?
Are my thoughts moot, because shims are chosen for a distinct combination of optics and focus mount, with too many possible combinations?
I have a digital Fuji I can test with, or film test with my Leica. No digital Leica with live view available. I would prefer to not tear the optics units apart and swap all elements from one housing to another. So trying that would be my last resort.
Thanks in advance
Lukas