Nikon axes comfort women photo exhibition

shiro_kuro

Charles Bowen
Local time
6:34 AM
Joined
Jul 1, 2006
Messages
557
Location
Hawaii/Japan
This persistent denial of the Japanese by the crimes of the Imperial Army before and during WWII is probably the number one reason why they continue to be resented and hated in Asia.

I had family in Burma, China, and Singapore during the war.
The brutality of the Japanese was no propaganda. It was real.
It took some courage of Nikon to allow the exhibition to be scheduled in the first place. Then, cowardice took over.
 
The japanese are not the only group guilty of brutality during war.
And not all Japanese are guilty of this brutality, or of not accepting it as truth.
 
True, Frank. But on the scale of 1-10?

I think his point is that if you pick your people and moments in time, every culture has produced more nastiness than the human race can be proud of.

I, for one, say shame on the humans. Long live the peaceful apes.
 
On a scale of 1 to 10 how racist is the dislike of a whole race of people, most of whom are individuals innocent of the cause of the hatred?

This is no longer a photographic discussion. There is a forum for this.
 
There is a memorial dedicated to the Comfort Women here in Northern NJ, in the town of Palisades Park. Just recently, the Japanese Consulate tried to have it removed. When that didn't work, members of the Japanese government came, and also tried. When the township refused to budge, they resorted to denial -- that the Comfort Women did so voluntarily. I applaud Palisades Park for standing up to what it believes.
 
It's a shame that Nikon surrendered to cowardice or pressure. I looked at the link that ShiroKuro posted, and the images are powerful.
 
Thank goodness we have moderators to tell us how to think properly, some discussions would be too difficult for us primitives to handle.

The fact is, that more than any other modern First World country, the Japanese have managed to avoid and forget their history. Young Japanese get a filtered, distorted history of World War II and the run-up, which can't be good in the long run. Contrast that to the German experience.
 
Since the end of the war, the Japanese have gradually whitewashed what happened. Textbooks and history books have become written in a more passive way, and subjects like comfort women, treatment of POWs, and Unit 731 are often not mentioned at all.

At every anniversary of the dropping of the atomic bombs there are protests and speeches by right-wing nuts screaming that the use of atomic weapons and the following US military occupation were unjustified. And if you were a student nowadays reading Japanese history as it is written, you would likely agree.

But my grandfather fought in the Pacific during the war for the entire duration. He fought the Japanese on the Philippines, and was one of the handful who were evacuated with General MacArthur. He later participated in the battle of Manila, and was present at the signing of the surrender on the battleship Missouri. After 4 years of fighting, he was one of only two survivors of the original troop deployed to the Pacific.

Comfort women were also used after the war, but they were intended to serve the US occupation force so as to prevent US soldiers from fraternizing with ordinary Japanese women.

There are Japanese who are quite honest about what happened during the war, and I have seen fights break out at the yakuza-organized right-wing rallies. Ordinary Japanese suffered under the former government before and during the war, and expected worse things to come after the surrender. To their surprise, the change brought about after the war was good. When I meet older Japanese who experienced the war and post war years and tell them that I am an American, they often thank me.

But other Japanese are ashamed of their history, and prefer that it not be brought up. This is wrong, it denies the sacrifices, good and bad, of those
who fought and suffered, making them all for nothing. I'm rather ashamed of Nikon for canceling this exhibit.
 
Thank goodness we have moderators to tell us how to think properly, some discussions would be too difficult for us primitives to handle.

The fact is, that more than any other modern First World country, the Japanese have managed to avoid and forget their history. Young Japanese get a filtered, distorted history of World War II and the run-up, which can't be good in the long run. Contrast that to the German experience.

I'll be pedantic.

FACT: a piece of information presented as having objective reality.

It would be difficult to empirically prove to me that the Japanese whitewash *more* than the U.S..

The world is full of nations and organizations that behave badly. Is this conversation making it any better? If you think having the exhibit shown would make it more so, I think a better use of energy would be to write to those who made the decision and voice your disappointment rather than to argue about who should win the international turd of the century competition.

Positive, not negative, action.
 
I rather think that any conversation, where people state their views and listen to those of others, will help to make things better. Of course, if no-one listens, then the whole thing is a waste of electrons.
 
Some years ago we were watching a TV program on one such woman and when we saw on TV her house we recognised it as being in our district. That brave woman told of her ordeal as a forced comfort woman and it was degrading to say the very least, both mentally and physically. She had kept it quiet for decades but then I guess as part of the healing process went public.
A remarkable woman and as it turned out, a with a remarkable husband.
 
Back
Top Bottom