nokton35/1.4mc test film&digtal

First shot color seems good, rather thick for my taste but nice still. The out of focus rendering seems ok, but for a 35 1.4 is seems there is an awful lot that can still be seen for being shot at 1.4. I am guessing this was taken at about 1.4 meters give or take? Also that light hanging to the left of her head has some odd bubbly spots around it, some more shots maybe?

The second shot, its very bubbly like the old leitz 50 summarit 1.5, color is nice though, I like.

The third shot...seems to have some obvious vignetting which is no biggy, no 1.4 lens would be a 1.4 lens without it. Colors seem smooth and nice although the line above the single cake on the bottom is awfully hard, maybe resize or sharpening problem.
 
Last edited:
She looks like a keeper to me! Thanks for the work and sharing. The only way I would see improving the lens is to come out with it in SC mount so I could use it on my S3-2000. It would end my lusting for a 35/1.8, well maybe not end it all together but it would make it controlable without medication.

B2 (;->
 
The lens has a lot of things going for it, price, size did I mention price? But the OOF rendering, especially the so called "double lines" are not for me. I think I will bite the bullet and get the 35 Lux Asph though I really wanted to get this lens....
 
ah, the first one can not show the orignal details of the film, the scan's dynamic scope is thin,so you can find out of central is dark.

the digtal is another issue,lens modern coated better than olds for ccd/coms expose.

thanks to comment on this little enough lens:)

i would like to post more pictures by it
 
Last edited:
volvohagi said:
to avotius: would you introduce the pictures in your flickr how you made your film transfer to digtal? by what scan?
Click to expand...


我的照片是在一个专业放照片的地方扫描的.我也是在那里冲我的胶卷，他们是一家专业的富士冲放胶卷的店.
他们扫描的时候不要调太多，在扫描的软件，最好扫描很普通的样子,因为扫描仪和你看的地方扫出来放大的时候不一样.也有我拍胶卷的时候，我一般拍它在,比如400度我就拍400,或是多一点点光,象320度这样.也在拍负片,因为我比较喜欢它拍出来的颜色和效果.简单一点扫描,颜色没有那么容易会过的很快，颜色很容易出来


For those of us who are not into reading that gibberish up there:

I use a pro photo lab that has a very good fuji scanning station, I can dictate to them how I want my stuff scanned and they do a really good job on the digital transfers but sometimes they dont quite get it right and I have to guide them on what I want. Mostly the best thing in my case is to scan the image so the rendition looks a little flat then tweak it in photoshop to taste. Also I mostly only shoot negative film which I find is a lot more lenient and usually its shot at box speed (400) or with very slight over exposure (320) also its a lot easier to control color shifts and blocked up colors with negative film then it is with slides, though at the expense of image density, but I like this effect.
 
to avotius:非常谢谢你，在这里用汉语交流很有趣（thank you very much,communication by Chinese here is kindness ang funny）

yes，i started my rf photo life from last summer,and buy the r2 and r-d1 body,but recently i always saw many impressive pictures in internet by good scanning,i supposed the orignal scan's software is weak than the third-party's ,for example sliverfast...

and at the same time flat-scanning is more weak than pro lab's machine like imacon848 etc.

i will try the pro scanning

thanks for the information
 
Actually, I remember being young and full of...well...full of myself. Now that I know what an idiot I am, arrogance is harder to come by.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom