squirrel$$$bandit
Veteran
I was a little embarrassed at myself for actually buying one of these on eBay--but at $479 for the lens, case, and hood, it seemed like money I could easily get back should I change my mind. But holy crap, look at these portraits, taken wide open without more than a moment's thought.
Increasingly, the more I experiment with them, I think Pen lenses are the perfect manual focus companions to the m4/3 system. They render beautifully with this sensor; they feel very "native."
I think this lens would be ideal for bringing, say, to a restaurant in order to snap portraits of your friends across the table...or to a party or reception for candid head shots.
Increasingly, the more I experiment with them, I think Pen lenses are the perfect manual focus companions to the m4/3 system. They render beautifully with this sensor; they feel very "native."
I think this lens would be ideal for bringing, say, to a restaurant in order to snap portraits of your friends across the table...or to a party or reception for candid head shots.


Trius
Waiting on Maitani
Lovely, John!
Do you have an M42 adapater? If so, I'll lend you my Helios 44-M. It's a 58/2, and I'd love to see how it compares.
Do you have an M42 adapater? If so, I'll lend you my Helios 44-M. It's a 58/2, and I'd love to see how it compares.
squirrel$$$bandit
Veteran
I don't have one, not yet--I have a few Pentax lenses I'd like to try, though, so I will probably get a K-mount one. And I have a couple K-42 adapters.
The nice thing about the Pen lenses is the size--they are nice and small, and the adapter is quite shallow.
The nice thing about the Pen lenses is the size--they are nice and small, and the adapter is quite shallow.
photogdave
Shops local
Nice looking shots, but they seem a little soft. Camera shake maybe?
user237428934
User deletion pending
For me my 50mm on my G1 is almost an "extreme telephoto lens". So 60mm would be too close for my taste.
squirrel$$$bandit
Veteran
Yes, correct--very narrow DOF and a bit of shake are to blame. I was just testing it out at 1.5 to see what it could do. By 2.8 it's quite sharp...
fotomeow
name under my name
the fotos do look surprisinly nice for the age of the lens (how old??).....
At first the fotos did appear a little soft, but the closer I look at them, I think that the area of focus is so shallow (these shots are taken wide open and close to the subject) that everything outside that small focal area appears soft..
I would like to see some shots with the lens NOT wide open and further away from the subject: If these shots are crisp, then that would support the quality of this lens.....
And Mabelsound, if you are willing, could you also post a couple B&W shots??
At first the fotos did appear a little soft, but the closer I look at them, I think that the area of focus is so shallow (these shots are taken wide open and close to the subject) that everything outside that small focal area appears soft..
I would like to see some shots with the lens NOT wide open and further away from the subject: If these shots are crisp, then that would support the quality of this lens.....
And Mabelsound, if you are willing, could you also post a couple B&W shots??
squirrel$$$bandit
Veteran
OK, I didn't mean this as a real test, but here are some quick shots taken outside, mostly at f/5.6 and f/8. Forgive the hugeness of the pics, but this should give an idea of resolution.
Honestly, I don't know the data here, but on his site Dante Stella said:
They are certainly resolving enough for me. These came out of Lightroom2 with default sharpening.
Honestly, I don't know the data here, but on his site Dante Stella said:
Olympus Pen lenses, by virtue of their short focal lengths (shorter for half-frame), had greater depth of field and ultra-high resolving power (many lenses topped 80lp/mm at multiple apertures).
They are certainly resolving enough for me. These came out of Lightroom2 with default sharpening.




squirrel$$$bandit
Veteran
100% crop of rooster's eye. The lens is certainly getting the most out of the sensor, IMHO.

Focusing shouldn't be difficult on a GF1 with viewfinder, but off the LCD, it's probably more of a challenge, but these look great, John.
squirrel$$$bandit
Veteran
I'm finding that if I have time to compose, the LCD is no problem at all, even wide open. The LCD on the GF1 is really quite spectacular.
Someday I would like to get a body with a proper viewfinder, though, perhaps a used G1. Or wait for some future Olympus body with the EVF built in.
Someday I would like to get a body with a proper viewfinder, though, perhaps a used G1. Or wait for some future Olympus body with the EVF built in.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.