peterm1
Veteran
I am just watching a video about Andrew Wyeth - American Painter (born 1917 - died 2009)
I was not previously much aware of him (if at all) but I was interested to find out more and set about Googling him. One of the things that struck me about some of his work is just how much of a photographic eye he had. I particularly mean in terms of choice of subject and composition more so than that his images are necessarily look like anything other than paintings. And yes the more I think about it on, reflection it does definitely have something to do with his choice of subject..............and the fact that he was a "realist" in style. At the end of the video Michael Palin (who narrates) refers to Wyeth capturing "....the universal in his own backyard." Isn't that exactly what most of us photographers strive to do most of the time (particularly now with lockdowns)? But more to the point, isn't that the essence of good image making - capturing the universal in the detail and the ordinary?
In other words had he been using a camera I would have looked at his images and thought "Golly he has caught that moment well".
It struck me as a possible idea for a thread here - which painters strike you in the same way. Are there others? I am sure there must be. (Hopper perhaps?)
Ironic in a way. I struggle, usually unsuccessfully, to try to make photos that have a painterly quality about them. And here is a painter - a genius none the less who effortlessly make paintings that look like photos (while retaining their painterly aspects).
The video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNuGbKIoUds
Some images by Wyeth:
I was not previously much aware of him (if at all) but I was interested to find out more and set about Googling him. One of the things that struck me about some of his work is just how much of a photographic eye he had. I particularly mean in terms of choice of subject and composition more so than that his images are necessarily look like anything other than paintings. And yes the more I think about it on, reflection it does definitely have something to do with his choice of subject..............and the fact that he was a "realist" in style. At the end of the video Michael Palin (who narrates) refers to Wyeth capturing "....the universal in his own backyard." Isn't that exactly what most of us photographers strive to do most of the time (particularly now with lockdowns)? But more to the point, isn't that the essence of good image making - capturing the universal in the detail and the ordinary?
In other words had he been using a camera I would have looked at his images and thought "Golly he has caught that moment well".
It struck me as a possible idea for a thread here - which painters strike you in the same way. Are there others? I am sure there must be. (Hopper perhaps?)
Ironic in a way. I struggle, usually unsuccessfully, to try to make photos that have a painterly quality about them. And here is a painter - a genius none the less who effortlessly make paintings that look like photos (while retaining their painterly aspects).
The video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNuGbKIoUds
Some images by Wyeth:
