Archiver
Veteran
I know, I know. Apples and oranges. Different systems, different sensor sizes. But I'm thinking of either one of these lenses and will probably end up with both, just figuring out which will be more useful. Thinking out loud with the RFF collective wisdom to throw suggestions and rocks at me, haha.
PL 12: Excellent image quality, good low light performance which helps with the four thirds sensor, compatibility across my many m43 cameras which include very small bodies. I've wanted one for many years, and they are generally more expensive new than I want to spend. They turn up secondhand for reasonable money now and again, I just want to decide whether I get this, or the full frame equivalent.
Pana 24: reviews suggest great image quality, f1.8 will offer more shallow depth of field than f1.4 on micro four thirds, it has the advantage of use on my S5, S1 and SL2-S and all the image quality that implies. There's a sale on right now where it is less expensive new than the PL 12 secondhand, which is very surprising and uncommon.
Yeah, I'm just thinking out loud again.
PL 12: Excellent image quality, good low light performance which helps with the four thirds sensor, compatibility across my many m43 cameras which include very small bodies. I've wanted one for many years, and they are generally more expensive new than I want to spend. They turn up secondhand for reasonable money now and again, I just want to decide whether I get this, or the full frame equivalent.
Pana 24: reviews suggest great image quality, f1.8 will offer more shallow depth of field than f1.4 on micro four thirds, it has the advantage of use on my S5, S1 and SL2-S and all the image quality that implies. There's a sale on right now where it is less expensive new than the PL 12 secondhand, which is very surprising and uncommon.
Yeah, I'm just thinking out loud again.