aniMal
Well-known
There has been many a discussion on the crackdown on photography in public places.
I just saw this video in a Norwegian newspaper, with footage that appears to be inteded for real intelligence gathering. The "tourists" who were filming in the london underground were evicted, and the police claim that they might have been connected to Al Quaida:
http://www.vgtv.no/?id=27650
The intro is in Norwegian, but the main content is in English.
I can see that this might be case from the footage, what other reason would one have to use a videocam in that manner?
Perhaps the autohorities should take us photograpers on board, instead of trying to ban all photography. I would be very easy for a photographer to see that these guys were up to something. Then a few questions would really make it clear...
I just saw this video in a Norwegian newspaper, with footage that appears to be inteded for real intelligence gathering. The "tourists" who were filming in the london underground were evicted, and the police claim that they might have been connected to Al Quaida:
http://www.vgtv.no/?id=27650
The intro is in Norwegian, but the main content is in English.
I can see that this might be case from the footage, what other reason would one have to use a videocam in that manner?
Perhaps the autohorities should take us photograpers on board, instead of trying to ban all photography. I would be very easy for a photographer to see that these guys were up to something. Then a few questions would really make it clear...