Priorities

R

ruben

Guest
You know, sometimes when you hear so much times the same thing, you start to loose your self confidence and question yourself. On the other hand if you never ask you may be missing something.

Therefore, could you street photographers explain me why the hell you prefer Aperture Priority cameras over Shutter Priority ones ?

Hyperfocal focus. Fine. F/8, Fine. What else ?

Cheers,
Ruben
 
I use all manual as wel.

I do have Aperature Priority on my most recent camera but I have yet to use it. Too worried about it selecting a shutter speed that I dont want to use.
 
It doesn't really matter because controlling one affects the other. It is simply a preference based on how you like to do things and/or what you have been exposed to along the way. One preference is no more valid than another.
 
It does not really matter of course but I find that when I shift the dial on my digital from program it is usually to go to aperture priority. Because, of course, the thing that really interests me in street or landscape photography is depth of field. While I can get the correct setting by using shutter priority as well it is sort of "one step removed" in my thought processes. If I have a manual focus lens mounted which has zones of focus marked on them then aperture priority makes even more sense as I will usually focus by reference to hyperfocal distance. Of course as far as my film cameras are concerned, they are all fully manual. But even here, my usual procedure is to set the aperture and hyperfocal distance (if it is bright enough to sustain a small aperture and I am using a wide angle lens) then as I move around into shade and sunlight I adjust the speed accordingly while changing the aperture and distance set on the lens as little as possible.
 
Last edited:
I, too prefer all manual, but shutter priority over aperature. On the street you a photographing movement there shutter is more important. I like to photograph at 125 and sometimes faster. That is where I make my adjustments.
 
Guess I'm in the minority here as I prefer aperture priority over shutter priority if I'm not using a fully manual camera. Reason is that I want to maximize depth of field in a typical street shot and would rather let the camera figure out what shutter speed is needed (and no, I'm not concerned about some movement in the scene being blurred if the shutter speed is too slow since in my view that just adds to the feeling of action in the scene). Conversely, if I was using a shutter priority camera, I would always be concerned about making sure to maximize depth of field which would motivate me to lower the shutter speed to perhaps an unnecessarily low degree. And if I want to play with depth of field to isolate a subject a bit more then I can more easily do that with aperture priority than with shutter priority. Now that I think about it, I'm basing this on using cameras (e.g, Olympus XA vs Minox 35 ML) that are scale focused rather than via a rangefinder in which case depth of field becomes more important.

-Randy
 
Your preference may depend on the type of SLR you are/were used to. Nikon and Pentax went with aperture priority, while Canon went the shutter priority route. (Not sure which way Olympus and Minolta went.) Like Randy, I prefer aperture priority to control DOF.
 
ruben said:
Therefore, could you street photographers explain me why the hell you prefer Aperture Priority cameras over Shutter Priority ones ?

Hyperfocal focus. Fine. F/8, Fine. What else ?

Cheers,
Ruben
Click to expand...
DOF effects. It frees you to think about the plane of focus you want and whether it is practical in the available light at your disposal. When I was young and moving on up from my first SLR (Zenit 3M) to a fancy Japanese SLR I was desperate for a Konica. I was distraught when I found out that they only made shutter priority models. :(
 
I prefer aperture priority because for what i might shoot on the street (i ain't a real street photographer, though!) it rarely matters if the sh speed is 1/60, 1/125, 1/250, 1/500, 1/1000 or anything between. But it does matter if it is f/2 or f/11.
 
My preference goes for all manual too. But I was talking about those cameras which being all manual or not, do offer a priority as well, such as the Oly RC, Canonets, Konica Auto S3,etc. With manual only cameras my main concern in the street is the fastest speed available according to the lighting conditions.

Although at this stage of the thread the (Roman) phalanxes of aperture priority remain relatively calm, in many threads I have found the motto "what a pitty the camera was made in shutter priority...."

But I have not found any single supporter of shutter priority beyond myself.

Cheers,
Ruben
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sorry, all manual as well.

But in the times I did use autoexposure I found aperture priority allowed me to optimize the shutter speed in low light - can't get faster than wide open.
 
Finder said:
....But in the times I did use autoexposure I found aperture priority allowed me to optimize the shutter speed in low light - can't get faster than wide open.
Click to expand...

So at least menthally you are a shutter priority mind, like me.

Cheers,
Ruben
 
Hmmm. When I'm using auto-exposure I almost always use aperture priority, because I'm concentrating on getting the depth of field I want to achieve (whether that be large or small). Others seem to be concentrating on freezing motion (or, perhaps, not) and hence seem to worry more about shutter speeds.

When I'm manually setting exposure I work the same way - I try to set the aperture I want then vary the shutter speed to get the right exposure, whereas others (it seems) set the shutter speed they want and vary the aperture. "Whatever works best for you", I guess. Personally, I find that depth of field, to my eye, has a great deal of impact on the overall look of a photo, I concentrate there first and compromise only when correct exposure won't give me a useable shutter speed. But that's just me.

...Mike
 
Hmm, I'd always go for an all manual option where available, as all my rangefinders are 100% mechanical, I have generally no option!

With my P&S (Lumix LX1) and dSLR (EOS 20d) I almost always use Aperture Priority. When I am using these cameras I am either looking for ultimate portability (LX1) or photographing my fast moving kids (dSLR).

It is the way I was taught, and after 25 years or so, it is ingrained. I think of the aperture first depending upon available light and/or the effects I want to achieve, e.g. nice background blur for a portrait or large dof for landscape.

I only really check the shutter speed to ensure blur free photographs ;)

I guess there is no 'right' way, except whatever works for you!:)
 
Last edited:
Thanks folks,
So far you are bringing back my self confidence,
on behalf of SHUTTER PRIORITY !

Cheers,
Ruben
 
This thread hits a funny bone of mine. I see not much difference between the two (although I do find I thing "aperture priority" faster since Nikon is the only non-manual system I've used in any significant amounts). My Sekonic light meter offers display in both modes, however. The only difference is which component value of EV is displayed bigger than the other. What I find funny is that there isn't a display mode that displays both values the same size; I think they should revamp their software and put in a "manual mode"!
 
I'm with Ruben here - I like shutter priority. It's probably because I'm used to using cameras with shutter priority AE (35RC and a QL17), but mainly because I just treat it as 'program mode' - I just twiddle the dials until I get the settings I want, as they're both linked in AE mode. And the RC has that immensely awesome shutter speed dial on the top, rather than on the lens. Also my SLR (a Pentax MZ-M) doesn't show aperture in the finder for my SMC-M lenses, which rather defeats the purpose of it being aperture priority.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom