quick-and-dirty comparison of flare and stray light

sebastel

sebastel

coarse art umbrascriptor
Local time
4:53 PM
Joined
Jul 10, 2006
Messages
1,296
as a number of 50mm lenses of varying age and condition have collected in my cabinet, i had the idea of comparing them for flare and susceptibility to stray light.

conditions were worst case: i took pictures with my computer monitor at the border and outside the field of view. the monitor had a distance of about 1 meter, while the focus point was at about 2.5 meters.

focus was on the staple of printing paper on the window pane. outside the window, you can see street light at a distance of about 500 meters.
pictures were taken fully open, and at 1.4, 2.0 and 4.0 where available.
pictures were taken with a leica M9, set at ISO 200, internally processed for black & white with high contrast. no post processing. exposure time was determined with a gossen sixtomat digital (incident light metering at the point of focus).

the lenses included in this comparison are:
an uncoated leitz elmar, with scratches in the front element,
a single coated industar 50,
an uncoated summitar with round aperture blades,
a single coated summitar with hexagonal aperture blades,
an uncoated carl zeiss jena (prewar) sonnar 5cm/1.5,
a single coated carl zeiss jena (postwar) sonnar 5cm/2.0,
a carl zeiss ZM sonnar 50mm/1.5,
a carl zeiss ZM planar 50mm/2.0,
and finally a cosina voigtlaender nokton 50mm/1.1.

you can find the pictures (including full resolution) in my flickr set "coating and flare":

http://www.flickr.com/photos/83765003@N00/sets/72157628801338983/


hope this is of interest to someone ...

cheers,
s.


edit: sorry for the messed sequence of the pictures in the flickr set. that was the flickr upload program, not me!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom