kena
Established
Went out to buy some lumber today and did a RD1 vs Iphone comparison.
All RD1 pics are with a new to me Canon 35/2.8 @ iso 200
hipstamatic-

photo 3 by kena63, on Flickr
RD1- f.8

_EPS2038 by kena63, on Flickr
and in B&W

_EPS2038_1 by kena63, on Flickr
and another-

photo 2 by kena63, on Flickr

photo 3 by kena63, on Flickr
f 2.8

_EPS2043 by kena63, on Flickr
All RD1 pics are with a new to me Canon 35/2.8 @ iso 200
hipstamatic-

photo 3 by kena63, on Flickr
RD1- f.8

_EPS2038 by kena63, on Flickr
and in B&W

_EPS2038_1 by kena63, on Flickr
and another-

photo 2 by kena63, on Flickr

photo 3 by kena63, on Flickr
f 2.8

_EPS2043 by kena63, on Flickr
kena
Established
umcelinho
Marcelo
i don't see how they would be comparable, they're extremely different cameras. I don't use hipstamatic, but instagram, which is free, has some nice filters, saves the photos in the original size and works great for everyday random snaps, but the r-d1 is for taking photos, iphone is for taking snaps.. i use both and take advantage on the pros of each. but still, low light with an iphone is too much of a stretch, and its af is pretty slow, i miss some great casual shots sometimes because it won't pick up focus.
kena
Established
i don't see how they would be comparable, they're extremely different cameras. I don't use hipstamatic, but instagram, which is free, has some nice filters, saves the photos in the original size and works great for everyday random snaps, but the r-d1 is for taking photos, iphone is for taking snaps.. i use both and take advantage on the pros of each. but still, low light with an iphone is too much of a stretch, and its af is pretty slow, i miss some great casual shots sometimes because it won't pick up focus.
Its obviously not a REAL comparison…….just bored and had both on me. I also take plenty of just snaps with the RD1 too. But for a Phone camera the iphone is pretty good and its always on your person…..

photo 4 by kena63, on Flickr
Share: