Reverse 'Cantax' - Remounting a Jena Sonnar into a Canon brass mount

TenEleven

Well-known
Local time
12:23 PM
Joined
Apr 16, 2012
Messages
695
The head bartender nicknamed the Canon 28mm f3.5 lens for Contax mount the "Cantax", quite catchy. So, I guess taking a Contax lens and using a Canon shell to put it into LTM could thus be called reverse "Cantax".

I happened upon a very cheap (~$45) Canon 50/1.5 that I picked up on a whim. Sadly it had the Canon glass disease quite badly and no amount of cleaning and even polishing would help. In the flashlight test the rear triplet lit up like a disco and the images the lens made in anything but the most subdued light could be described as impressionistic.

Image from iOS(18).jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	Image from iOS(18).jpg Views:	0 Size:	340.9 KB ID:	4768863

A couple of months later I picked up a Contax mount collapsible Sonnar which had likely seen a nasty fall. Most likely lens first with the lens extended. The "nose" was bent and the lens had a totally broken collapsing mechanism, with two of the prongs sheared clean off. I offered the seller ~$90 and he accepted. Originally the plan was to harvest the glass out of the destroyed mount and put it in a black and nickel lens.

m67013315436_3.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	m67013315436_3.jpg Views:	0 Size:	23.0 KB ID:	4768864

However to my chagrin the transfer to the Nickel lens failed due to different front element diameters. Also, drop damage and oily aperture aside the lens was in such good condition that it seemed a shame to break it apart.

Plan B: Try put in another rear mounting claw onto the lens. However, the screw holes were located such that I would have to drill one hole right on top of the next - which would make rather questionable structural integrity. In the collapsible Sonnar design the lens is more or less suspended from the rear claw.

Thus - Plan C: Following Brians guides I shortened the Sonnars focal length from ~52.3mm to 51.7mm by filing down the lens housing and moving in the rear triplet by about ~0.1mm. I discarded the totally destroyed rear "claw" section and kept the rest of the lens, giving it a good clean and doweling out the impact points.

Then I removed the lens from the Canon lens, put it in a safe place for parts and renovated the focus mount as much as possible. After everything was back together I filed out the part the lens rides on in the Canon focus mount. This had to be done as the "throat" of the Canon lens is very narrow and I kept the Sonnar in its original Barrel sans mount part.

I stuck everything together and cut a very fine spacer out of a sheet of copper to retain the lens into the mount. I also filed down and then fitted the replacement "claw" sans screw back. The filing was done so that the "claws" wouldn't create friction against the rotating RF cam. With this arrangement the individual prongs of the claw end up pressing against the rolled copper tube making for a secure fit holding the lens snugly in place. No glue needed. Since the original baffling would not fit - I blackened out the rangefinder cam with matte black paint. You can see all that below:
Image from iOS(17).jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	Image from iOS(17).jpg Views:	0 Size:	222.4 KB ID:	4768865

I also made a slight modification to the Canon focus stopper mechanism allowing for slightly closer focus making sure that my LTM cameras can still focus. I chose the last point before they disengaged. I guess it was a sliver under 85cm or 2.8'.

Image from iOS(9).jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	Image from iOS(9).jpg Views:	0 Size:	334.5 KB ID:	4768866

I love how closely the knurling of Zeiss and Canon matches.
After that I aligned the aperture dot to the focus indicator on the Canon and re-indexed the Sonnars aperture to follow. And with that I was done.

Image from iOS(6).jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	Image from iOS(6).jpg Views:	0 Size:	234.4 KB ID:	4768867

I ended up filling the bald spots in the name-ring with black and white paint - also thanks to careful doweling the lens now accepts filters and hoods as usual. Since all the parts are brass or glass the lens is small but rather dense and heavy.

Image from iOS(19) copy.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	Image from iOS(19) copy.jpg Views:	0 Size:	312.9 KB ID:	4768868

247g or 8.71oz a rather hefty little fellow. I hope you liked this excursion of "lens hacking" - I'm sorry that I don't have taken any pictures of the "guts" but I was too busy measuring and filing before I even considered making this post. But I have a hunch this won't be the last lens I do like this and I shall take more pictures for the next one.

Image from iOS(8).jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	Image from iOS(8).jpg Views:	8 Size:	250.1 KB ID:	4768870
 
Here's some of the test pictures I took to verify that focus and everything works properly. I apologize for these pictures being kind of boring. I am in the process of taking a proper test roll now that I know that it works and will update the thread accordingly.

All pictures are straight scans of Fuji 100 film. No post or anything done.

Infinity at f/2
test_1.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	test_1.jpg Views:	0 Size:	118.9 KB ID:	4768873


100%
test_1_close.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	test_1_close.jpg Views:	0 Size:	255.3 KB ID:	4768874

Near range ~4 feet f/2 focus on central dolls face
test_2.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	test_2.jpg Views:	0 Size:	176.3 KB ID:	4768875


100%:
test_2_close.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	test_2_close.jpg Views:	0 Size:	320.2 KB ID:	4768881
(Here you can once again see that Sonnars are much happier when working in close, contrary to internet wisdom this is not unique to the Nikkors.)

Near shortest focal distance of ~2.9 feet at f/2 focus on white crane in glass box
test_3.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	test_3.jpg Views:	0 Size:	112.1 KB ID:	4768876
100%:
test_3_close.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	test_3_close.jpg Views:	0 Size:	159.0 KB ID:	4768877
(Demonstrating one reason I love Sonnars: superb delicacy in rendering transparent surfaces and surfaces with depth such as wood)

Medium distance f/5.6
test_4.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	test_4.jpg Views:	0 Size:	124.6 KB ID:	4768878

Closer f/4
test_5.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	test_5.jpg Views:	0 Size:	216.5 KB ID:	4768880

Street snapshot f/4
test_5.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	test_5.jpg Views:	0 Size:	216.5 KB ID:	4768880
 
That is impressive! The lens looks like it was made that way and not hacked together out of damaged components. Also, it looks like your new lens has a really nice front element. those are often kinda beat up or scratched on the pre-WW2 f2 Sonnars. I am also surpised that you got it to accepts filters given damaged rim. Judging from the pics, it looks like you nailed the reconstruction and focus. Congratulations!
 
Thankyou for posting this project! The lens came out beautifully. It is sad that so many Canon lenses have etched glass- and this is a great use for the mount.
 
That is impressive! The lens looks like it was made that way and not hacked together out of damaged components. Also, it looks like your new lens has a really nice front element. those are often kinda beat up or scratched on the pre-WW2 f2 Sonnars. I am also surpised that you got it to accepts filters given damaged rim. Judging from the pics, it looks like you nailed the reconstruction and focus. Congratulations!

Thank you!
For good measure here's a picture of it with the fantastic screw-in 40.5mm Walz "For Sonnar" vented-hood mounted. (These are getting rare now.) To be honest I was surprised at the result myself - given the state of the front ring and the crudeness of my dowel.

Image from iOS(20).jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	Image from iOS(20).jpg Views:	0 Size:	237.7 KB ID:	4768887
(Sorry about the dust - black cameras make the dust extra visible.)

And yeah I agree that the front-glass is in rarely-seen good shape. I've seen maybe 6-10 collapsible lenses in this good shape. And I've looked at a lot of them. My guess is that it took the tumble quite early in its life - breaking it but also saving it a lot of wiping and cleaning with neckties and other unsuitable cleaning implements.
 
I have one of those old Walz hoods, would buy more if they show up on eBay, but rarely do. The Kenko vented hoods of the same era are just as nice as the ones made by Walz.
 
Back
Top Bottom