Rokkor 40mm - nice day, nice lens!

pfogle

Well-known
Local time
9:24 PM
Joined
Feb 28, 2005
Messages
766
A few more samples from the Rokkor - I find this lens a little more forgiving than the 40/1.4 CV - a little gentler on the highlights, perhaps.

From a very pleasant walk on Hampstead Heath... :)
 

Attachments

  • _EPS1818.jpg
    _EPS1818.jpg
    175.2 KB · Views: 0
  • _EPS1815.jpg
    _EPS1815.jpg
    133.4 KB · Views: 0
  • _EPS1844.jpg
    _EPS1844.jpg
    196.8 KB · Views: 0
  • _EPS1831.jpg
    _EPS1831.jpg
    85 KB · Views: 0
  • _EPS1790.jpg
    _EPS1790.jpg
    116.2 KB · Views: 0
dmchadderton said:
Nice n crisp shots. But what is the 'fringing' on the rh vertical of the third pic? Is it just a product of the scan?
it's an out-of focus column that wasn't visible in the viewfinder!
 
I love this lens on the RD1, have 2 now, one is the QF or triangular tabbed rokkor 40/2, the other is the more common rectangular tabbed rokkor. Both are great wide open, and are m/c, and non-CLE versions, are ultra light and small even with hoods.
 
Good pictures pfogle! I like the first one very much since the red leave is standing out so nice!

I love this lens too! recently I´m enjoying the color the lens delivers very much. I have the Leitz version and it´s permanently married to my M6. The Lens is soo small and light that the Leica feels very pocketable.. also the fov is growing on to me. perfect street lens!

my pictures with the ´CronC:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/57493810@N00/tags/summicronc/
 
Phil,
Yea I'm not that in love with my Nocton 1.4 SC either- the high lights are too hot and the OOF areas are not so pretty. Any suggestions from an old hand on how best to use the Nocto? (off topic but not really: )

Nice shots on the Rokkor

Ted
 
I tend to use my Nokton almost exclusively as a B&W lens, and normally in low-light conditions. I've used it a hell of a lot recently, the last two sets I've uploaded to Flickr are almost exclusively with it...
 
Sailor Ted said:
Phil,
Yea I'm not that in love with my Nocton 1.4 SC either- the high lights are too hot and the OOF areas are not so pretty. Any suggestions from an old hand on how best to use the Nocto? (off topic but not really: )

Nice shots on the Rokkor

Ted
The Nokton is a good cloudy day lens when you want more contrast. Example here:
http://www.pbase.com/scho/image/71750880
 
thanks thafred: the pix on your site are terrific. The FOV on the Epson is more like a 60mm than a 40mm on the full frame.

Ted: my approach with the Nokton would be to shoot RAW and then apply an 'anti-S' curve to lower the contrast. Also, keep the camera settings you're using to minimum contrast; that way the in-camera jpgs will be softer, and the histogram will give a more realistic estimate of the brightness range of the scene. The histogram shows the brightness levels of the in-camera conversion, not the RAW itself, I think.

At the end of the day, though, the Nokton's a great lens if the scene isn't too contrasty.
 
The M-Rokkor 40/2 is a great little lens. Just a few weeks ago, I took off the 50/2 Carl Zeiss and replaced it with the Rokkor. I can't say I'm let down by this lens. It's an entirely different lens from the CZ, different characteristics, but great anyway. It'll be on the R-D1 for a while. :)
 
postie just delivered my Leitz version, what a tiny jewel! Flatter than my collapsible, and my j12. Come on, lunch hour (or two). :D
 
If you keep the original firmware loaded

If you keep the original firmware loaded

you don't need to shoot RAW or fiddle with Curves, the in camera JPG processing does it right.

pfogle said:
thanks thafred: the pix on your site are terrific. The FOV on the Epson is more like a 60mm than a 40mm on the full frame.

Ted: my approach with the Nokton would be to shoot RAW and then apply an 'anti-S' curve to lower the contrast. Also, keep the camera settings you're using to minimum contrast; that way the in-camera jpgs will be softer, and the histogram will give a more realistic estimate of the brightness range of the scene. The histogram shows the brightness levels of the in-camera conversion, not the RAW itself, I think.

At the end of the day, though, the Nokton's a great lens if the scene isn't too contrasty.
 
ampguy said:
I love this lens on the RD1, have 2 now, one is the QF or triangular tabbed rokkor 40/2, the other is the more common rectangular tabbed rokkor. Both are great wide open, and are m/c, and non-CLE versions, are ultra light and small even with hoods.

I haven't seen this first lens you mentioned. Would it be possible to see both side-a-side?

Thanks!
 
sure

sure

I'll try to take some snaps today or tomorrow of the 2 rokkor 40s.

kds315 said:
I haven't seen this first lens you mentioned. Would it be possible to see both side-a-side?

Thanks!
 
The QF is on the Right

The QF is on the Right

note the focus tab on the QF is like a molded old style infinity lock type assembly, and the s/n is on the front, the left is like the CLE with S/N on barrel like the CLE Japan versions, both are M/C just like my CLE 40/2s.

photos are in med. jpg macro mode of fuji f30, iso 1600, 2.8, med. room light on.

kds315 said:
I haven't seen this first lens you mentioned. Would it be possible to see both side-a-side?

Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • DSCF0890.JPG
    DSCF0890.JPG
    768.2 KB · Views: 0
  • DSCF0891.JPG
    DSCF0891.JPG
    769.9 KB · Views: 0
  • DSCF0892.JPG
    DSCF0892.JPG
    760.9 KB · Views: 0
  • DSCF0893.JPG
    DSCF0893.JPG
    739.2 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
How many CL/CLE 40mm Rokkors were there? I have one similar to the second one above, but it doesn't have the QF designation. S# 202251. Otherwise it looks the same as yours (pretty much just like the Summicron-C).
 
4 that I know of

4 that I know of

MIJ, Rokkor branded M-mount.

davidbivins said:
How many CL/CLE 40mm Rokkors were there? I have one similar to the second one above, but it doesn't have the QF designation. S# 202251. Otherwise it looks the same as yours (pretty much just like the Summicron-C).
 
pfogle said:
A few more samples from the Rokkor - I find this lens a little more forgiving than the 40/1.4 CV - a little gentler on the highlights, perhaps.

From a very pleasant walk on Hampstead Heath... :)

yes, I think the Rokkor is a softer renderer. I owned the Nokton once, and it was really nice, but I think more contrasty than the Rokkor, and not as gentle on tones.
 
Back
Top Bottom