punkzter
Established
p.giannakis
Pan Giannakis
It does look like schneideritis to me. Let's see what others, more experienced members, will say.
oldwino
Well-known
Schneideritis by any other name...
punkzter
Established
That's odd, right? For a lens of this vintage?
Archlich
Well-known
Reminds me of the M-Rokkor 28/2.8. Are the elements clear?
punkzter
Established
Good question, I don't have that answer. I'm looking into this lens, but haven't actually purchased it.
I've never seen that in any Voigtlander lens.
Where is the seller located?
Where is the seller located?
Nitroplait
Well-known
As it appears on the photo, it won’t affect photo quality. But if this is the only known example of this phenomenon in this particular lens model, I wouldn’t buy it - as it is unknown how it will develop over time.
james.liam
Well-known
It's not an inexpensive lens. Take a pass on this one.
punkzter
Established
Thanks, I agree
Retro-Grouch
Veteran
I've never seen that in any Voigtlander lens.
Where is the seller located?
Actually, I have a Color Heliar 75/2.5 of about the same vintage. It developed a slight case of schneideritis that never progressed further. Also, I had the 28/3.5 in Nikon SC mount (otherwise the same lens). It developed pronounced internal haze which was deemed unrepairable by the folks at Skyllaney. Apparently, early Voigtlanders used a non-balsam cement that was prone to fogging. I would examine any potential purchase very carefully!
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.