On the specs it appears the type II lens focusses down to .5 meters (RF coupled to .7 meters) and the type I (both M and LTM) focusses down to .7 meters. Specs seem clear on both Fred Miranda's review and Stephen Gandy's website.The review at FredMiranda states a minimum focus distance of 0.5m, the official description at Cosine's web site states "The shortest shooting distance linked to the rangefinder is 0.7m.". Does it mean that the lens focuses closer than 0.7m but without RF coupling? I pre-ordered the LTM version from Yodobashi Camera here in japan but curious about minimum focal distance.
correct. couples to 0.7m, uncoupled to 0.5m. This is for the Type II M-mount. The LTM will not focus closer than the coupled distance of 0.7m.
Many thanks for the clarification!On the specs it appears the type II lens focusses down to .5 meters (RF coupled to .7 meters) and the type I (both M and LTM) focusses down to .7 meters. Specs seem clear on both Fred Miranda's review and Stephen Gandy's website.
damn, this is kind of a tough audience.
The late LTM Voigtlander 28/3.5 was an instant classic and much missed from the day it was discontinued, about 15 years ago.
Now a new much better 28/2.8 arrives in a choice of six tasty flavors and hardly any comments at all.
damn, this is kind of a tough audience.
The late LTM Voigtlander 28/3.5 was an instant classic and much missed from the day it was discontinued, about 15 years ago.
Now a new much better 28/2.8 arrives in a choice of six tasty flavors and hardly any comments at all.
BTW, Fred Miranda found it a better lens overall than the Leica M 28/2.8 V2 at only $2800.
If I didn't already own said 28/3.5, I would be grabbing one of these f/2.8 ones without hesitation. I do like the classic focus tab/infinity lock and overall styling, but I can't justify owning two lenses that are so similar to each other - even if I am excited to see new LTM lenses appearing after such a long drought.damn, this is kind of a tough audience.
The late LTM Voigtlander 28/3.5 was an instant classic and much missed from the day it was discontinued, about 15 years ago.
Now a new much better 28/2.8 arrives in a choice of six tasty flavors and hardly any comments at all.
Yes, but it also seems the Ultron is clearly better stop-to-stop. While the Ultron is indeed heavier (double) by comparison, it's still relatively small and light. Given the choice, for the price difference, I'd still opt for the Ultron. And the Color-Skopar's version II screw-in shade - with all due respect to the designers - seems pretty lame. I felt the same way bout the original 28 Ultron's screw-in shade.... BTW, Fred Miranda found it a better lens overall than the Leica M 28/2.8 V2 at only $2800.