Still no Noctilux/0.95 photos around

[Prosaic]

Nothing on flickr, nothing here. Are there any in the hands of working photographers at all?

 

[35mmdelux]

People that own the .95 Noct probably dont use them for fear they might not be collectible anymore.

 

[samoksner]

I want to see that and shots from the 24 and 21mm summiluxes!

 

[Freakscene]

I got to test the Nocti and Summiluxes, but agreed to a non disclosure agreement with the magazine that leant them to me. It now seems likely that they won't publish the Nocti review because I wasn't 100% positive.

Marty

 

[splitimageview]

Venture over to getdpi.com

 

[KM-25]

I want to see the .95 on a good film.

 

[peter_n]

Plenty of shots from these lenses on the German Leica User Forum. There are some recent shots from the Noctilux and many from the 24.

 

[Ronald_H]

I don't understand... since when are Noctiluxes actually meant for taking pictures? They are meant for bragging about and gently drooling over, the one time per year users dare take them out of the safe.

 

[TJV]

Wow, looks pretty good to me.
$10K is a lot for anything, but if you've got the money the new 0.95 looks like a great tool for what it's designed for - low light and / or shallow DOF without sacrifice.

 

[Debusti Paolo]

haven't you seen the price tag?

 

[antiquark]

A few low resolution pics here:
http://fast-eddy.air-nifty.com/river/

 

[Riccis]

I have a couple on my blog and Flickr... I will post more in the coming weeks as I receive more developed film from my lab.

 

[35mmdelux]

A few low resolution pics here:
http://fast-eddy.air-nifty.com/river/

Excellent collection of images and comparatives. TKS.

 

[35mmdelux]

A few low resolution pics here:
http://fast-eddy.air-nifty.com/river/

What handle is that on your MP? TKS

 

[antiquark]

What handle is that on your MP? TKS

Sorry, I should have mentioned those are someone else's pictures, not mine 😱.

 

[Debusti Paolo]

nice pics.It's all about bokeh....

 

[elude]

/ A lens is meant to be used, not reviewed and analysed. I find this need of webpictures sample quite odd for a photographer /

 

[urban_alchemist]

I'm waiting on mine (30th bday present but was held up by unspecified 'issues') - I'll be sure to give it a thorough workout with both film and digital (mostly film) and post some shots. Just don't expect depth-of-field tests against rulers or pictures of my dog 😉

 

[Prosaic]

/ A lens is meant to be used, not reviewed and analysed. I find this need of webpictures sample quite odd for a photographer /

I find ignorance on technology quite odd for a photographer.

 

[b.espahbod]

so its ok for some ppl to buy a $10000 lens without knowing the characteristics and style of the picture it generates. THATS ODD!