sar-photo
Simon Robinson
Great - the thread about my zine documenting the funeral of Margaret Thatcher has been moved to the 'Off Topic' forum. This means that it no longer shows up in the list of active threads 
The original thread can be found here.
Anyway, here's another photo from the zine...
Cheers
Simon
The original thread can be found here.
Anyway, here's another photo from the zine...

Cheers
Simon
Last edited:
Roger Hicks
Veteran
But it does show up in "Today's Posts".
Cheers,
R.
Cheers,
R.
Rodchenko
Olympian
Great photos. And thanks for posting the 'other bowler-hatted chap'.
Were they some sort of doormen, or other officials?
Were they some sort of doormen, or other officials?
IanBiggar
Member
Twatcher Ezine
Twatcher Ezine
Nice one Simon
Ian
Twatcher Ezine
Nice one Simon
Ian
sar-photo
Simon Robinson
Great photos. And thanks for posting the 'other bowler-hatted chap'.
Were they some sort of doormen, or other officials?
I assumed the bowler-hatted gentlemen were just business men, they certainly weren't officials of any sort!
I did see a few other bowlers on the day, but these three were definitely the nattiest.
Cheers
Simon
Rodchenko
Olympian
OK. it's just that bowlers are a very rare spot even in the City these days. I know there are a lot of Officers of obscure organisations in the City, particularly the Guilds, who might have turned out on the day. Perhaps they were just dressed in a more traditional manner (as they may have been in the 70s and 80s more normally) out of respect for Ma Thatch. Good shots, anyway.
Rodchenko
Olympian
Btw, you're stoking up my desire for an X-Pro 1 again.
sar-photo
Simon Robinson
Btw, you're stoking up my desire for an X-Pro 1 again.
Gotta love the X-Pro!!
Here's another photo that's in the zine - a chap in a menswear shop looking at the spectacle.

Cheers
Simon
Rodchenko
Olympian
Oh, I love that one! He looks a bit like a mannequin.
Michael Markey
Veteran
Btw, you're stoking up my desire for an X-Pro 1 again.
Missed that bit ... yes looking at those and the XE myself.
Yet more great shots Simon ...
Lflex
Lflex
Great - the thread about my zine documenting the funeral of Margaret Thatcher has been moved to the 'Off Topic' forum. This means that it no longer shows up in the list of active threads![]()
Why not respect the moderators decision?
sar-photo
Simon Robinson
Why not respect the moderators decision?
Because the original post was not off topic - it was about a booklet of photographs documenting an important event in British history. The thread contained photographs and many of the comments related to the photography and zine. Some of the posts within the thread were more about the person rather than the photography but that was to be expected - she was a very polarising politician.
Cheers
Simon
Lflex
Lflex
Because the original post was not off topic - it was about a booklet of photographs documenting an important event in British history. The thread contained photographs and many of the comments related to the photography and zine. Some of the posts within the thread were more about the person rather than the photography but that was to be expected - she was a very polarising politician.
Cheers
Simon
Well, the moderators thought that that is where it belongs. Why not respect that?
pdh
Established
And now this thread is about to be derailed away from Simon's work by nitpicking about his posting it!
(fill in sighs, rolleyes and various other grumpy emoticons)
(fill in sighs, rolleyes and various other grumpy emoticons)
Lflex
Lflex
And now this thread is about to be derailed away from Simon's work by nitpicking about his posting it!
(fill in sighs, rolleyes and various other grumpy emoticons)
Our volunteer moderators have moved it for a reason - it does not happen by accident and I think their work deserves some respect.
sar-photo
Simon Robinson
Here's another shot. This is the colour original - the one in the zine is b+w.
Cheers
Simon

Cheers
Simon
Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
Great - the thread about my zine documenting the funeral of Margaret Thatcher has been moved to the 'Off Topic' forum. This means that it no longer shows up in the list of active threads
Photography and photojournalism is an off topic on RFF. OK.
If you made your next zine about camera bags, perhaps it'll get reconsidered :angel:
back alley
IMAGES
Photography and photojournalism is an off topic on RFF. OK.
If you made your next zine about camera bags, perhaps it'll get reconsidered :angel:
quit with the cheap shots about rff or maybe just quit rff!
if you dislike it here so damn much why do you keep coming back?
maybe you think your cheap shots are adding something positive to the membership?
Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
Easy, joe. It's not a cheap shot.
That I keep on coming back means that I don't dislike it.
It would be nice, however, that the time spent on scolding me would have been better spent by the moderator who moved it to Off Topic as to why it was moved to Off Topic.
The Invisible Hand without any feedback can be perceived as backhanded.
Friends don't only pat each other's backs. They tell them nicely when something's off.
For example, I didn't say "hey joe, if you dislike the membership so much why do you keep on interacting with them?" No. That's not how I feel, anyway. But if I did, I'd probably do that via PM.
I do, however, think that photography and photojournalism (and on top of it, taken with a rangefinder) isn't exactly "Off Topic".
That I keep on coming back means that I don't dislike it.
It would be nice, however, that the time spent on scolding me would have been better spent by the moderator who moved it to Off Topic as to why it was moved to Off Topic.
The Invisible Hand without any feedback can be perceived as backhanded.
Friends don't only pat each other's backs. They tell them nicely when something's off.
For example, I didn't say "hey joe, if you dislike the membership so much why do you keep on interacting with them?" No. That's not how I feel, anyway. But if I did, I'd probably do that via PM.
I do, however, think that photography and photojournalism (and on top of it, taken with a rangefinder) isn't exactly "Off Topic".
back alley
IMAGES
mods are not expected to defend their actions here...
why is it that the action of a mod is considered wrong without question?
i am tired of being second guessed and the assumption instantly made that the mod is wrong.
when a thread starts going off course there is the time consuming option of making many deletions to keep it on track...move it to off topic or just close it.
yesterday we closed a thread that was starting to be anti semetic...and there was an uproar...of course it was assumed that the mod was wrong...
maybe some would enjoy a more 'wild west' approach be taken at rff and let anything be...
i have seen sites hit bottom because moderation was too lax...
why is it that the action of a mod is considered wrong without question?
i am tired of being second guessed and the assumption instantly made that the mod is wrong.
when a thread starts going off course there is the time consuming option of making many deletions to keep it on track...move it to off topic or just close it.
yesterday we closed a thread that was starting to be anti semetic...and there was an uproar...of course it was assumed that the mod was wrong...
maybe some would enjoy a more 'wild west' approach be taken at rff and let anything be...
i have seen sites hit bottom because moderation was too lax...
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.