dee
Well-known
Ask most Russian dealers and they will state that a later K 4 is a better bet as a user than an ancient K 2 , which is far more likely to be tired .
I was caught up in the K 2 / K 3 klassic Konundrum , and have 2 of each , all needing a bit of expensive tlc .
I have today bought a k 4 / 1 1970 [ on the borderline of quality ] from cupog - cla , for £50 incl shipping .
i guess I will have 80% of the feel of a K 2 , at a sensible price , and will be less bothered about it eventually breaking ,and /or dropping it !
I have had excellent results from my Oleg K 4 and K 4m , so why was I concerned about all the negative Komments these cameras attract ?
.. and I am getting into rekovering in dee-ferent leathers !
I was caught up in the K 2 / K 3 klassic Konundrum , and have 2 of each , all needing a bit of expensive tlc .
I have today bought a k 4 / 1 1970 [ on the borderline of quality ] from cupog - cla , for £50 incl shipping .
i guess I will have 80% of the feel of a K 2 , at a sensible price , and will be less bothered about it eventually breaking ,and /or dropping it !
I have had excellent results from my Oleg K 4 and K 4m , so why was I concerned about all the negative Komments these cameras attract ?
.. and I am getting into rekovering in dee-ferent leathers !