The Russian Canonet?

I've wanted one for a while, because of the fine Industar-73 lens. Its the same lens as on the never reliable (or reliably never quite working) Lomo 135 with the spring-powered film advance. In any event, these don't show up very often.
 
A 40/2.8 and no manual speeds. That sounds like a Canonet 28, which is _very_ cheap, but a nice little cam.
 
iggers said:
I've wanted one for a while, because of the fine Industar-73 lens. Its the same lens as on the never reliable (or reliably never quite working) Lomo 135 with the spring-powered film advance. In any event, these don't show up very often.
Dan, I shot one roll with a 135VS and sold it. The lens wasn't very good at all.
 
Good to one person and good to another is matter of personal preference. A lens is 'good' based on a number of characteristics decided on by the person using it and good can mean a variety of things. Sharp can be good, but soft can also be good. Good is a variable thing.
 
Electra was an OK camera back then. These days, however, its batteries are no longer produced, and exposure control circuits are often drifted out of calibration by now.
 
Another problem with 20-30 yr old camera, is "what has it been thru"?

All it takes is a drop or two to knock it out of alignment.
 
Back
Top Bottom