fidget
Lemon magnet
Whilst I am thinking of fixing my Moskva 5 (lens not parallel to the film plane) I had an urge to try out some of the simple folders I had bought. From down near the bottom of the "shouldn't-have-bought-that" box, I dug out my Kershaw 450 6x6 folder (sorry, not rf). Cheaper than the cost of postage, and a very neat, well made camera, I couldn't get rid of it.
So on a nice day I popped in a roll of HP5+ and took a short walk on the moors. I shot all 12 exposures at the top speed of 1/200, handheld. They were all around f11. When I developed them, I was surprised to say the least. Very detailed images with no signs of leakage or other nasties.
I will try this camera out at different settings.
I wonder what other modest glass gives nice results at small f's? ( I have read, and was energised into trying this after reading comments here about how small a difference there is between good glass and ordinary glass at f8....thanks!)
Kershaw 450, f4.5 Otar lens, Vario shutter.
attached full neg scan and enlargement of detail area.
Dave
So on a nice day I popped in a roll of HP5+ and took a short walk on the moors. I shot all 12 exposures at the top speed of 1/200, handheld. They were all around f11. When I developed them, I was surprised to say the least. Very detailed images with no signs of leakage or other nasties.
I will try this camera out at different settings.
I wonder what other modest glass gives nice results at small f's? ( I have read, and was energised into trying this after reading comments here about how small a difference there is between good glass and ordinary glass at f8....thanks!)
Kershaw 450, f4.5 Otar lens, Vario shutter.
attached full neg scan and enlargement of detail area.
Dave
Attachments
Last edited:
shadowfox
Darkroom printing lives
That's medium format for you 
I am also blown away at the results from what supposed to be a third-tier glass on some of the more "economical" lens (usually paired with an economical shutter assembly )
I have an Ansco Viking with Agnar 105/6.3 (??) that produces 6x9 negatives with amazing details and tonality. To bad it has some pinholes on the bellows that needs to be patched. (And I need to get an MF scanner, sigh...)
I am also blown away at the results from what supposed to be a third-tier glass on some of the more "economical" lens (usually paired with an economical shutter assembly
)I have an Ansco Viking with Agnar 105/6.3 (??) that produces 6x9 negatives with amazing details and tonality. To bad it has some pinholes on the bellows that needs to be patched. (And I need to get an MF scanner, sigh...)
bcostin
Well-known
I've never heard of a Kershaw before. Very sharp indeed.
I've also been pleased with the old folders I've tried, both the sharpness and the quality of the bokeh when opened up a bit. Here's a shot with an inexpensive 4.5x6 format Welta Perle (sorry, another scale focus camera). This was about f5.6, I think. I'm pretty pleased with its performance:
I've also been pleased with the old folders I've tried, both the sharpness and the quality of the bokeh when opened up a bit. Here's a shot with an inexpensive 4.5x6 format Welta Perle (sorry, another scale focus camera). This was about f5.6, I think. I'm pretty pleased with its performance:
fidget
Lemon magnet
Very nice shot, you did well to get that focus right on a scale focus camera. Perhaps we should now carry a 10ft tape measure for those close up shots!
oftheherd
Veteran
bcostin - that is a great shot. Do you have other Weltas or have you been able to avoid the bite of the bug?
Malcolm_J
Member
I think the simple ones are the best. I can't see why complications like rangefinders (esp coupled ones) and auto wind-on really add anything. I would actually prefer if my 523/16 did not have double-exposure prevention, as I have managed to lose a frame through releasing it without taking the picture - I had instantaneous second thoughts, my mistake and not the camera's. Estimating the distance is a habit once you have used 35mm rangefinders for a while.
Very much in praise of simple cameras and cynical about how Japanese marketing, combined with sympathetic journalism, has been able to herd the market towards excessive, expensive gismo-photography.
Very much in praise of simple cameras and cynical about how Japanese marketing, combined with sympathetic journalism, has been able to herd the market towards excessive, expensive gismo-photography.
fidget
Lemon magnet
Before I managed to run another film through the Kershaw, I won an Ensign 420. This has the Ensar lens, a triplet I believe. Will run a film through this at weekend and dev rolls from both. I wonder if they give the swirly bokeh described in another thread.
Krosya
Konicaze
Weltas are fantastic cameras and the early ones with coupled RF are superb! Those pre-war cameras really show the type of craftsmanship that hard to find today. I have one that's from about 1937 or so and after simple CLA it's an outstanding folder. Gives me a 6x6/645 option, fast 2.8 lens thats even good wide open. If you get one of these in a good condition - it's a wonderful camera.
and here is a photo taken with one:
and here is a photo taken with one:
Last edited:
Krosya
Konicaze
It does with colour as well, and it's an uncoated lens:
fidget
Lemon magnet
That's very nice. Great detail in the subject and what looks like smooth bokeh in the highlight to the right. Is this a four element lens?
Krosya
Konicaze
Thank you. It's a 4 element Xenar lens. I suppose similar to the Zeiss Tessar one.
kully
Happy Snapper
I bought a Kershaw 630 from a bloke who did them up and sold them on.
I've never developed a film from it though, you've given me the impetus to go out with it tomorrow.
Does the 450 have a rangefinder? I'm a bit worries about the focussing as the 630 doesn't have a rangefinder at all.
I've never developed a film from it though, you've given me the impetus to go out with it tomorrow.
Does the 450 have a rangefinder? I'm a bit worries about the focussing as the 630 doesn't have a rangefinder at all.
fidget
Lemon magnet
kully said:
No, it has the usual distance scale focus in feet. I've yet to finish a further film from this (poor weather and no time). On the strength of the first film, I've bought a couple more folders, a Kershaw King Penguin and an Ensign 420, both 6x9.
The Penguin could well be in a category even lower than "low spec", so will wait (and wait..) for an outing. The Ensign arrived in near mint condition and was immediately tried on a wet and overcast weekend in the English Lake District. On a tripod at f11 to f22, 1/4 second or longer, it gave very impressive results (looking at scans of the negs). I guess that this camera will show poorer performance when tried at larger apertures or in sun, but is very promissing and enjoyable to use.
At one place visited by quite a few tourists (even in the rain), a crowd stood back whilst I wrestled with the tripod, aim, shutter and aperture settings (need glasses on for this). A picture of the crowd, standing back, digi's poised, would have made a much better image than the one that my outfit was pointed at..........I missed the opportunity again....
Show us some of the shots from yours too.
Edit: I just saw a 630 on Feebay, it's identical to the 450, but with a smaller lens. good luck...
Dave
Last edited: