Ko.Fe.
Lenses 35/21 Gears 46/20
It looks like all manual and rangefinder.
boojum
Ignoble Miscreant
Blending old and new. It looks interesting. $$??
lynnb
Veteran
Looks great. I’d be more interested if they released one that used Instax Square film. The credit card size Instax Mini film is a bit too small IMO.
Retro-Grouch
Veteran
It looks like no electronics, and maybe a crank to eject the film. Also appears to have real controls on the lens. And who is making "spring driven" leaf shutters these days, unless TTA is making its own? Very interesting! And probably not cheap...
cboy
Well-known
If they put a rangefinder in camera such as this then we can safely say all those naysayers who said it's expensive to tack on a rangefinder, to put a sock in it then show them this camera, because we know full well it ain't gonna cost as much as a Leica
Chriscrawfordphoto
Real Men Shoot Film.
I want this!
DownUnder
Nikon Nomad
Me too. I'll pair it with my 1950 Zeiss Nettar and my 1953 Voigtlander Perkeo I. For a 1947 photographer.
Now if only somebody (are you listening, China?) could produce an affordable instant film for this little beauty...
Now if only somebody (are you listening, China?) could produce an affordable instant film for this little beauty...
Last edited:
KoNickon
Nick Merritt
Very interesting indeed. Let's see what the details are.
robert blu
quiet photographer
Interesting, very inteteresting...I would like to have one...
Out to Lunch
Ventor
wlewisiii
Just another hotel clerk
The missed a beat by not going with a Tessar design, alas.
rhl-oregon
Cameras Guitars Wonders
I’d buy this as opposed to a plastic point and shoot blob, for the pleasure of rangefinder focusing, metering, metal heft and folder controls.
If this succeeds, maybe a 120 film version comes next—another reason to support TTArtisan. I use several of their lenses for M and L and X mount.
If this succeeds, maybe a 120 film version comes next—another reason to support TTArtisan. I use several of their lenses for M and L and X mount.
wlewisiii
Just another hotel clerk
I just remembered - the Seagull Folder was numbered the 203. Perhaps calling theirs the TT203 is a riff on that?
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
Easy for the factory to make it into a reintroduced Seagull 203 camera taking 120 film.
Godfrey
somewhat colored
Looks neat.
I have some Instax wide i should use up.. i'll pull out the MiNT RF-70 for that.
G
I have some Instax wide i should use up.. i'll pull out the MiNT RF-70 for that.
G
neal3k
Well-known
Here is my Seagull 203 for comparison.
Seagull 203 by Neal Wellons, on Flickr
I would certainly be interested in the Instax shooting TT203.

I would certainly be interested in the Instax shooting TT203.
CMur12
Veteran
The missed a beat by not going with a Tessar design, alas.
For the size of the print, I think a Tessar-type lens would have been overkill.
The triplet should be more than adequate and this camera definitely has my attention.
- Murray
KoNickon
Nick Merritt
So the rewind crank would eject the film? Presumably you'd have to turn it properly in order to release the developer, right? Very cool concept, for sure. It would be interesting to see what a decent lens can do with the Instax Mini format.
wlewisiii
Just another hotel clerk
Yeah but I'm a Tessar fanboy! Just ask Sonnar BrianFor the size of the print, I think a Tessar-type lens would have been overkill.
The triplet should be more than adequate and this camera definitely has my attention.
- Murray
cboy
Well-known
With way it works and the effort in its mechanism it's probably better suited for more deliberate shooting such as a TLR.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.