Two girls + Leica M8 + M-Hexanon 35/2 + Jupiter-3 50/1.5 = ?

Rust

Member
Local time
2:49 PM
Joined
Jul 13, 2011
Messages
33
You can see more full size pictures from this set here:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/rus_tam/sets/72157627361106121/

6066346954_ecaaa637b3_z.jpg


6066353934_b066a5e9d2_z.jpg


6066360172_251f0629f6_z.jpg


6065815847_aacb0af904_z.jpg


6066365786_74dc3c7d51_z.jpg


6065824849_e94a468c4b_z.jpg


6065827239_3f97f5b94f_z.jpg


6066374392_c6a9158f64_z.jpg


6065833171_feecef1e47_z.jpg


6066379536_5b256af3ff_z.jpg


6066388484_554caedfaf_z.jpg


6065845933_f204582a27_z.jpg


6065847915_fab9e13689_z.jpg


6065860325_e75ff77881_z.jpg


6066422250_9c63b6e6ae_z.jpg
 
I love my Jupiter-3 - very sharp and with great bokeh.
The only problem - it needs to be shimmed to get perfect focus.
 
I love my Jupiter-3 - very sharp and with great bokeh.
The only problem - it needs to be shimmed to get perfect focus.

Maybe so, but I would say that you are already doing tremendously with or without the shimming...
Due to your post, these lenses may go up in price ;-)
 
Pretty girls, very different faces and postures.

I like the pictures in which they appear together most because of that.

Flickr unfortunately over-sharpens any uploaded shot which IMHO does not contribute to portraits of women. I bet these look better on your monitor, straight from the software you edited them in.

Cool shots!
 
I didn't use any lenses except mentioned above. 47 and 70mm in 35mm equivalent.
Although sometimes I miss wide angle 28-35mm lens.
 
All really nice. Both girls very attractive but the girl on the left in the first image has got a great face. If she's not modeling full time, she should be.
 
Back
Top Bottom