martin-f5
Well-known
wray
Well-known
Martin, glad you finally received your V500. Well done image there! Yes, they are decent scanners for the money and I do have to agree about the film holders.
martin-f5
Well-known
martin-f5
Well-known
wray
Well-known
A-h-h, two more well done images! Prints do scan well don't they? Yes, I'm still using the stock film holders. Here's a scan I just did this morning of an old "Woodie" from an auto show this weekend.

martin-f5
Well-known
that's a great shot,
negativ scan?
are your negativs flat?
do you know that:
http://www.betterscanning.com/scanning/insert35.html
negativ scan?
are your negativs flat?
do you know that:
http://www.betterscanning.com/scanning/insert35.html
Last edited:
wray
Well-known
It's Fuji Superia 400 shot a 200 ISO. Yes, I've seen those glass inserts and seriously considering purchasing.
martin-f5
Well-known
martin-f5
Well-known
Senmu
Member
I use a Nikon Coolscan V ED for my 35mm scans, but recently picked up a V500 for medium format. I never used the stock, flimsy, floppy, 2-frame-only film holders. I had already ordered the variable height holders from betterscanning.com, and I love them. I also use VueScan exclusively on both 35mm & 120. Great results. I find I always scan at 3200dpi rather than the available 6400 though. I haven't needed the 180mb(!) files from 6400dpi. The 50mb files from 3200dpi suffice! 
Oh, and I looked at the V750 before purchasing. As far as I can tell, the V750 would be mandatory if I wanted 4x5 or 8x10 scans (shudder.... haven't bitten that yet.... but...) with its second lens. But the V500 is better than okay for 6x6 (with the aftermarket holders) and I much much much prefer the LED backlight instead of fluorescent, for ease of use, immediate startup, evenness of lighting, and ecological friendliness.
Oh, and I looked at the V750 before purchasing. As far as I can tell, the V750 would be mandatory if I wanted 4x5 or 8x10 scans (shudder.... haven't bitten that yet.... but...) with its second lens. But the V500 is better than okay for 6x6 (with the aftermarket holders) and I much much much prefer the LED backlight instead of fluorescent, for ease of use, immediate startup, evenness of lighting, and ecological friendliness.
Last edited:
martin-f5
Well-known
Pherdinand
the snow must go on
the 35mm holders for the v700 are quite fine. The 120 holders are not so fine, if the film is curled, but i still manage with them. The scanners' DOF is quite large. Just have to make sure the film does not cur so much that it would touch the scanner glass!
Attachments
martin-f5
Well-known
martin-f5
Well-known
P. Lynn Miller
Well-known
Ray,
Didn't you used to use a 4490? As you know I am looking for a medium format scanner and have a chance to get a 4490 at a good price.
Didn't you used to use a 4490? As you know I am looking for a medium format scanner and have a chance to get a 4490 at a good price.
martin-f5
Well-known
martin-f5
Well-known
martin-f5
Well-known
PATB
Established
Martin, thank you so much for the post. I am still looking for a MF (6x7) scanner and appreciate your V500 samples. Excellent photography.
P. Lynn Miller
Well-known
Martin,
You do not need to stop on my part. I am enjoying your photos. Thanks posting these scans as I am looking for a medium format scanner at the moment.
You do not need to stop on my part. I am enjoying your photos. Thanks posting these scans as I am looking for a medium format scanner at the moment.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.