Way OT. Pentax DSLR

Very good reviews - most agreed it was cheap for the quality. That should be even better now. Don't we have DSLRX-forums for this?
 
It's fantastic and a great RF companion

It's fantastic and a great RF companion

however, the mods don't like talk of it, though most any other OT subject is fine. Apparently the sponsors here don't carry it. Feel free to email me with questions, and there is a wealth of info. over here:

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/forum.asp?forum=1036

and yes it will use all 24-27 million K lenses in automatic Av mode (with manual focus), as well as all manual K and M42 (with adapter) in all manual, but ttl metering works.

pcfranchina said:
Any opinions on the Pentax *ist DL? Its come down in price and im itchen to buy something.
Click to expand...
 
I *really* wanted to like this due to the compatibility with old pentax glass, but after checking it out in person at the camera store I was really turned off. The materials and apparent build quality was simply appalling.
 
I bought an *ist DL last month and I really like it. Great fun & easy to use. It's more than enough camera for me.

One minor complaint: the kit lens is slow (but most kit lenses are -- the Pentax 50/1.4 is now on my shopping list). Despite that, I haven't touched my Bessa R since the *ist DL joined the stable.

PM me if you have specific questions.
 
I'd suggest getting the DS, black. The Pentax 50/1.4 is amazing and can be had new for $159 after $50 rebate from Pentax (what I did). I've had the DS for a while now and have had no issues whatsoever. The VF is very very good and controls are easy. It's an easy camera to like.
 
I'd have to agree with Andy- I own a DS also, but I'd rate manual focusing as a very real weak point. I understand the DL has an (even) poorer viewfinder. All of that said, the camera has proved very useful- I use it for most color imaging. I use it copystand style with a macro lens and 2 Vivitar 285's to "scan" my B+W prints. I use it as a sort of polaroid back for critical and tricky shots. How off topic is that?
 
Considering I already have a decent digital camera... I should hold off or buy the k100. My digital is a Konica Monalta a-200... Nice but the Manual Focus isnt that great there either. It has an electronic viewfinder that isnt that great. Not that great at high iso and dam slow in low light situations.
 
I have the istDS and use it commercially. Nearly every day. Solid and dependable, plus you can use all that wonderful old Takumar glass.
 
I'll add to the chorus of praise for the *istDS and K10D, which I own both of. The K10D is significantly larger, while the DS is much more "RF-like" in size and handling with a compact prime lens (the old Pentax-A SMC 28/2.8 is an excellent lens with this camera as all the metering options work, both manual and auto-exposure).

I'll add to the caution on the DL however, which I agree might not be as well built. We bought one for my wife which failed after about 2000 exposures. Pentax made three attempts to fix it and eventually sent us a K100D (with anti-shake) as a replacement. In all these cameras the image quality has been excellent, taking lenses into account.
 
Last edited:
Go for the K10D. Solidly built, with a 'weather-proof' body. Its nice large bright viewfinder makes for easy manual focusing. Plus its electronic manual focus indicator works with any lens, unlike with most other cameras. It also has a real prism in the finder (as opposed to periscopic mirror arrangements commonly found now in lower priced DSLRs) which makes the finder really easy to use.

Jay
 
As a user, I'll agree the comments on the K10D, but it is significantly larger than the *istDS and K100D. If I'm going out for a day of dedicated SLR photography, especially if long lenses are involved, I'll take the K10D and a bigger bag. If I'm just going out and want to take a camera "just in case", I'd grab the *istDS with a compact manual-focus lens or even the DA40, as that will fit easily inside a small shoulder bag.
 
I agree with ChrisN. The istDS with a prime is an excellent RF like camera. I tend to use mine like this. Also one advantage with Pentax is the pancake primes.

The viewfinder is good, and even better with the accessory magnifier or even an after-market split-image Katz eye screen.
 
More praises for the Pentax DSLRs. The *istDS was my first real SLR with which I learned most of what I know about photography. The DS with a DA40, kit lens and A50/1.7 covers just about everything that I need in a pinch. If it had a quieter shutter, it would be perfect (hence why I shoot primarily leaf shutter cameras like the Rolleiflex these days).
 
What I use mostly on my istDS is the DA 16-45 (24mm - 67.5mm equivalent in 35mm camera terms) as it covers "most" situations.

Great fun with the istDS when I use my M42 50/4 Super Macro Takumar!

Ted
 
Since I started this post last Aug. I have picked up a k100 with a kit lens. Loved it. It was my first dslr and my first AF camera. I got hooked. Since then I picked up a k10 with battery grip. Really nice cameras!
 
As an update to my previous post in this thread, I have been happily using my *ist DL for about a year and I'm still very pleased. It took me a few months to really learn the exposure pattern but it was time well spent.

I did indeed purchase the Pentax FA 50/1.4 and it is a great lens. The 75mm FOV and 1.4 speed make it perfect for available light portraits. I use this lens about 75% of the time. In addition to the 50/1.4 also bought few manual focus K-mount lenses for those times when I feel the need to roll old-school style.

I also sold my Bessa R. Hate to admit it, but I've gone almost completely digital (except for my Bessa L).
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom