Ming Rider
Film, the next evolution.
Yippee, another poll.
But with a General Election looming in the UK, these questions must be answered for the good of the nation (Yes, I made that bit up).
P.S. My new gallery is now online.
But with a General Election looming in the UK, these questions must be answered for the good of the nation (Yes, I made that bit up).
P.S. My new gallery is now online.
Last edited:
myM8yogi
Well-known
Pretty clear result so far ;O)
Livesteamer
Well-known
Economics. I love my M3's and M6's but I spent $2,500 on C41 processing last year. An M9 might not be too far away for me. Joe
Love Leica Ms and like digital, so a digital M was a must.
Ming Rider
Film, the next evolution.
What does it for me is the sheer simplicity of the camera. No bells or whistles (they tend to draw attention anyway) and the purity of the glass.
Plus, take a picture, add a sprinkle of Color Efex Kodachrome 64 and there you have it. Instant Bill Eggleston.
Plus, take a picture, add a sprinkle of Color Efex Kodachrome 64 and there you have it. Instant Bill Eggleston.
Last edited by a moderator:
maggieo
More Deadly
The M8 was, at the time I bought it, the only digital camera out there that was, you know, like a camera. It's not a wunderplastik thingy with plastic lenses that's twice as big as my F3, it's camera sized and recognizable as a camera. Oh, and it uses the best glass on the planet!
swoop
Well-known
I use a digital M because it works exactly like my film M but makes my job easier.
I'll be the first to admit any pro Nikon or Canon could achieve the same results. But I prefer working with my Leica because of the way it works.
I'll be the first to admit any pro Nikon or Canon could achieve the same results. But I prefer working with my Leica because of the way it works.
JonasYip
Well-known
I voted "other" since there was no option that mentioned size. Or more accurately, quality/size ratio. Optics and Image Quality would be the next reasons. But really if Nikon stuck a D3 sensor in an FM3 body, I'd probably be using that over my M9.
j
j
Ben Z
Veteran
I voted "other" since there was no option that mentioned size.
Ditto here. I gravitated to the Leica M back when I was shooting film, because I could tuck 2 bodies and 4-6 lenses in a reasonably-compact, body-hugging bag that was convenient to travelling, especially when using public transportation, and to keep on my lap in a restaurant. However now that I'm not travelling much anymore, I find myself gravitating back to SLR.
PatrickT
New Rangefinder User
A rangefinder without having to deal with film. *runs and hides*
alecgold
Established
A rangefinder without having to deal with film. *runs and hides*
hehe, heresy!
but i do understand it. As an amateur I cant spend 2500 bucks on c41 without having serious trouble with my significant other. And I like the fast results. specially when shooting thetered....
But I choose the M8 as well for the build quality, compact size without being finicky and I can get better pictures with this.
wontonny
Well-known
You forgot the option "It's a babe magnet"
JPSuisse
Well-known
Hi Ming Rider
I think you left out the most important reason:
General quickness and ease of integration into new media.
There are no other reasons that attract me to digital. For the quick snap shot and post to a website, digital is easier (more convenient). Is it better or worse than film? No. Is it more convenient? Yes.
JP
I think you left out the most important reason:
General quickness and ease of integration into new media.
There are no other reasons that attract me to digital. For the quick snap shot and post to a website, digital is easier (more convenient). Is it better or worse than film? No. Is it more convenient? Yes.
JP
Roger Hicks
Veteran
'Other'. In other words, all the same things that draw me to a film M.
Cheers,
R.
Cheers,
R.
flyalf
Well-known
Second that. Its hard to see why Nikon dont offer such a niche camera, a compact DSLR for thsoe wanting to do photography (as opposed to fiddling around with menus and joysticks). Or Olympus a D-OM-2.I voted "other" since there was no option that mentioned size. Or more accurately, quality/size ratio. Optics and Image Quality would be the next reasons. But really if Nikon stuck a D3 sensor in an FM3 body, I'd probably be using that over my M9.
j
kbg32
neo-romanticist
It is the best of the "digital Ms".
Thardy
Veteran
I don't have one, but I would say because it's digital.
back alley
IMAGES
i'm into the digital r so i'm guessing that i'm in the wrong place.
i like digital and i love rangefinders and i'm poor so that leads me to the rd1.
i like digital and i love rangefinders and i'm poor so that leads me to the rd1.
rya
Established
Agreed with Roger Hicks. Other.
I am a bit confused by the question, though. Is it really digital M as opposed to other digital cameras, digital M as opposed to film Ms, or digital M as opposed to every other photograph producing machine?
For a one system solution I see a film plus a digital M and lens (or a few) as the current solution.
I am a bit confused by the question, though. Is it really digital M as opposed to other digital cameras, digital M as opposed to film Ms, or digital M as opposed to every other photograph producing machine?
For a one system solution I see a film plus a digital M and lens (or a few) as the current solution.
Harry S.
Well-known
Other- Form Factor.
From what ive seen, my 5D Mark II makes much better images than the M8/9, but Id much prefer the smaller M and lenses in my hands.
From what ive seen, my 5D Mark II makes much better images than the M8/9, but Id much prefer the smaller M and lenses in my hands.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.