Which camera would you take to a U2 concert?

R

RangerRay

Guest
Looking for advice as to which camera you believe I would have a better chance of getting in to a U2 concert. My choices are either a Contax G2 or Fuji GA645Zi. I would be using 800 speed color print film. A few U2 fan web sites I've visited mention of only point and shoots being allowed. Some say that if the lens is removable it will not be allowed. There is also talk of security limiting lens length to 3 inches. Some say that DSLRs are not allowed but that some manage to sneak them in. I prefer to not hide anything and be straight up with all. I tried calling the stadium in order to obtain a press pass, but the stadium advised me to contact Live Nation, who is running the concert tour, for all press passes. So far I've had no luck reaching Live Nation staff. I took a disposable 800 speed camera to one of their shows back in 2001, but was only able to get 1 decent shot.
Any advice or recommendations would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
Ray
 
Enjoy the concert and leave the camera at home this time around. Check and find out what publications there are around town where you live. Staff photographers are pretty much a thing of the past, even on large dailies. Go talk with the editors. Show them your work.

You might end up shooting some gigs you don't want in order to get the ones you do, but when a publication wants press passes they usually get them. You might end up with a backstage pass, getting invited to the after concert party...it does happen.
 
Last edited:
Here's what I've done. I've put the camera body under my shirt and around the back, so there was no bulge in the front.

Then I put a short telephoto into a sack and taped it to my ankle.

Yeah, sounds dumb, but it worked.

I'm going to a concert in two weeks, but I'll be close to the stage, so I'm going to bring a Contax T VS. Or I might bring my Contax IIa and a 50 and 135 taped to my ankles.
 
Back in 2005, the security people allowed me to bring my Canon Powershot G2 (looks like a large film point and shoot) and I ended up with quite a few keepers despite pouring rain. If you get close enough to the stage, you ought to have enough lighting and can get away with shooting at iso400.

Not sure if they've changed the rules, but as long as you get close to the main stage, a point and shoot with flash can work pretty well, too.
 
Well, first of all, I'd take a camera I could afford to lose.

There's a U2 concert near here soon. If was going, I'd take my Ricoh GX200, which is not a p&s but looks like one. I would't want to deal with the hassle of trying to sneak a DSLR in.

Al's right. Just go and enjoy the show. The world is awash in concert photos. Your chances of getting a unique pic of Bono are essentially nil.
 
Al, You've given me good advice. I'll try local editors. If I can get an appointment, I'll get there a few minutes early, show them my best photojournalistic style work, be respectful and try to make a good impression. Who knows, I might just get my shot - even if it's for future events.

ZeissFan - too risky for me - I think I'll have a "Midnight Express" moment during the security check and my sweat and pounding heart will give me away.


wgerrard & Chyn- I've tried the disposable route before. Wanted to try with better equipment. My only digital is a Nikon D50. I think I'd be better off using film, but maybe I can borrow a good digital p&s.


35mmdelux - I tried my cellphone camera during their Vertigo tour - not even 1 decent shot - I'm better off with a high speed disposable.

Nikonos - I think they would definitely take away, but built like a tank so I'd probably recover it in the same condition - too bad I don't have one.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Light is way too low for a cellphone camera. A regular digital might do, as long as you're not looking for something to publish or blow up large. ISO 400 might not be enough, and ISO 800 is pretty bad on a lot of small-sensored digital cameras. If the rule is fixed lens, why not use a cheap rangefinder? I paid about $12 (plus shipping) for this Petri 7s and its f1.7 lens; I keep thinking that there's got to be a good use for that lens for something.
 
I once took an M4-2 and a 90 Tele Elmarit to a U2 concert, 1985. I wore some long socks and stuffed the lens in one, and the body in the other. I ran out of film about 3/4 of the way through the concert and bummed a couple of rolls off one of the tour photogs who was shooting near the stage. Stage spot lighting is usually plenty bright.
 
Canon Ixus would be the most expensive camera I would bring. If you miss your rangefinder I would suggest a Kodak Instamatic so you remember back in the days... :D
 
One that was bono fide with a lens that I new would give my shots the edge I was looking for! :angel:
 
There's always the possibility that you could B.S. your way past security, not even have an admission ticket with you. "Oh WOW! You're kidding! My editor told me that I could pick up my press credentials when I got here!"
 
If you haven't seen the 360 stage, go to U2 dot com's main page, and keep hitting refresh on your browser to see a different picture. You don't even have to enter the site. They have 9 awesome 1024 X 768 shots from their present world tour.
 
I'm leaning towards the 645Zi with Fuji 800Z film. It could be considered a point & shoot, has a non-removable lens, and the lens is less than an inch when the camera is in the off position. Maybe a small piece of electrical tape carefully cut so that the edges are rounded, placed over the top of the camera where it says "professional" might help. :cool:
 
I agree with Al...one paranoid roadie and your out a decent camera.
But the tour book, and avoid the cloak-and-dagger.
It's just not worth the pain in the a..
 
Or you could just skip it, scalp the tickets for twice what you paid, and go see a group whose singer is not all full of himself, who aren't corporate sellouts, whose music doesn't stink, and who will let you take their picture.

Imho that is. ;)
 
A Leica-M will probably be allowed. I'd take some Tri-X and push it to 1600. I think you'd get away with a 90mm. Just make sure you drive -- and don't take public transport -- in case you have to take something they disallow back to the car.

I was just at the Giants' Stadium gig and took a CLE with a Nokton 40mm, loaded with TriX @ 400. I was way up, and only got one I was kinda happy with:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/eavis/3976043788/
 
I have a rather blasphemous suggestion. Consider getting a Diana camera. They make 35mm sprocket hole photography adapters, and a 110mm lens. They are kitschy looking and made of plastic, so no one is ever going to stop you going in with one. You can load it with 800 or 1600 iso film, which should give a decent exposure of the stage. the downside is that it would set you back an extortionary hundred bucks or so for the camera, the 35mm adapter, and the telephoto lens. You could do it without the 35mm adapter, but 110m is a good bit longer on 35mm than 120, and you wouldn't have to change rolls as often.
 
None.

Well,if u wanna real hard to do it, u should take a point and shoot mega giga a$$ zoom.
Musicians will have lots of spotlights on them allowing for long lenses to be shot at short shutter times.

But why whould you do that, and worry about camera and shots when you are going to enjoy the music.

A small concert in a small room/pub stage/etc is different, as long as photography is allowed you can bring a very high performance low profile rangefinder or similar film camera.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom