amade1974
Newbie
I am a bit confused. I was thinking of treating exposing some lenses to sunlight/UV light, in order to prevent any fungus from growing in them. Then somewhere here I read that glass absorbs UV radiation anyway, so treating the lenses with UV/sunlight would not do anything.
so, extrapolating from this: if glass absorbs most/all of the UV light, then why should we bother with a UV filter in front of the lens (besides protecting from the elements that is?).
THanks,
K
so, extrapolating from this: if glass absorbs most/all of the UV light, then why should we bother with a UV filter in front of the lens (besides protecting from the elements that is?).
THanks,
K
chris00nj
Young Luddite
There are two camps on UV filters
One says that a UV filter can act like a protector against damage and can serve as a substitute for a lens cap (which you can't forget to take off)
The other camp says that adding another layer of glass can cause flare and reduce image quality.
One says that a UV filter can act like a protector against damage and can serve as a substitute for a lens cap (which you can't forget to take off)
The other camp says that adding another layer of glass can cause flare and reduce image quality.
charjohncarter
Veteran
I don't understand half of this but if you read 4 or 5 times it might become clear.
http://photo.net/equipment/filters/
http://photo.net/equipment/filters/
Optical glass passes UV, just not the entire UV band. A Calcium Fluorite, Quartz, or Salt lens is required to pass deep UV.
Film is sensitive to UV. You are getting rid of the "Near UV" with a UV filter.
Film is sensitive to UV. You are getting rid of the "Near UV" with a UV filter.
maddoc
... likes film again.
As Brian said. A "UV" filter only blocks very near UV radiation and thus prevents from chromatic aberration by UV (lenses are only corrected for a limited part of the spectrum) and also filters scattered sun light that has a maximum in the UV region (Raleigh scattering), which can cause a blue tint.
fixbones
.......sometimes i thinks
To me....
UV filter = transparent lens cap
UV filter = transparent lens cap
wolves3012
Veteran
Seconded - it's cheaper than bashing or getting nasties on the front element of your lens! I'll suffer the marginal risk of flare from a modern filter.To me....
UV filter = transparent lens cap
Chris101
summicronia
You may be willing to suffer flare, but how about the denigration of your forum-mates. Maybe it's more prevalent in DSLR internet communities, but you would think that nobody could ever take a picture with one of them stuck on their lens. Apparently it wrecks the "eye que".Seconded - it's cheaper than bashing or getting nasties on the front element of your lens! I'll suffer the marginal risk of flare from a modern filter.
bsdunek
Old Guy with a Corgi
I use a UV filter when I need it - aerial photography, or hazy days. Also a haze filter which is similar. Of course I'm liable to use a UV or Skylight if I'm in a situation that could cause lens damage, such as in blowing sand or salt water.
amade1974
Newbie
thanks! and thank you for the links. from the link that charjohncarter posted I understand now that lenses DO allow UV rays to go through, just not all going down to the low 200 nm range. IOW, the UV rays coming through will fool the film to think there is a lot more blue present than there actually is, and by doing so give the film an oversaturation in the blue color band.
I guess this also suggests I may be able to use sunlight/uv radiation to treat the lenses!
thanks again, this was very helpful!
I guess this also suggests I may be able to use sunlight/uv radiation to treat the lenses!
thanks again, this was very helpful!
dwaoka
emmigrant
serious uv exposure starts above 2000mtrs above sea level...
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.