Will the new Panasonic Lumix S series give Sony real competition?

My biggest problem with the latest offerings such as this is the "price is no object" philosophy in making them. Four thousand dollar cameras seem to be the new "sweet spot." Pretty soon, Leica cameras are going to look cheap!
 
My biggest problem with the latest offerings such as this is the "price is no object" philosophy in making them. Four thousand dollar cameras seem to be the new "sweet spot." Pretty soon, Leica cameras are going to look cheap!


2k is my sweet spot, 4k, the camera would have to last 10+ years, but they come out with new ones every couple and make out like if you don't get the newest one, you can't shoot good photos.
 
This is a $5k camera. Add to that a Leica L-mount lens and we're talking about gear that is obviously targeting a relatively small population, based on price alone. That relatively small population will be sliced and diced even further to specific uses, i.e., those who are willing and able to spend that kind of money to get the very best for their professional or well-heeled amateur use (assuming the S series lives up to all of the claims). Within those specific uses, what are the alternatives? A Fuji GFX 50R in some cases?

Assuming it lives up to the claims, I think it will carve out a niche for itself. Will it give Sony real competition? Maybe within that specific niche, but in terms of overall universal FF mirrorless utility and function -- no, not even close.
 
What are the respective MSRPs for the Panasonic S1 (24MP) and S1R (48MP) introduced today? Were any MSRPs announced for the three lenses also introduced?
 
So when are the affordable full frame digital cameras coming? In the days of film, there were pro 35mm models and models for regular people. Will such a thing not happen with FF digital? Are we the amateurs expected to just use our phones, wait a few years for used models, or settle for cropped sensors? Is there no democratization of FF digital coming?
 
it's odd that panasonic didn't make a video-centric model, since that's what they're best at. it's going to be an uphill battle in the still photo market.
 
So when are the affordable full frame digital cameras coming? In the days of film, there were pro 35mm models and models for regular people. Will such a thing not happen with FF digital? Are we the amateurs expected to just use our phones, wait a few years for used models, or settle for cropped sensors? Is there no democratization of FF digital coming?

The Sony cameras are the democratization, and they're made like cheap junk IMO. You want real quality, you need to spend more money. It's that simple.

I've found I don't really need the likes of the Leica SL or these new Panasonics anymore. I have my M-D when I want a FF sensor, but I'm getting such good results out of the Leica CL with its APS-C format, I just don't see the need for the larger sensor very often at all.
 
I really don't think Leica been ahead of the curve in years, there's to
much competition now.

I think Bill was being sarcastic and referring to Leica's prices.

That said, whether ahead of or behind the mythical technological curve is no relevant. Leica cameras continue to make some of the best photos around in the hands of good photographers, and that's what matters more than any notion of being ahead of or behind a curve.
 
So when are the affordable full frame digital cameras coming? In the days of film, there were pro 35mm models and models for regular people. Will such a thing not happen with FF digital? Are we the amateurs expected to just use our phones, wait a few years for used models, or settle for cropped sensors? Is there no democratization of FF digital coming?

They are here already.

Brand new Sony A7 is still being made and sold. $800 for 24mp FF sensor.
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1008114-REG/sony_ilce7_b_a7_mirrorless_digital_camera.html

No need to buy used.
 
You're right, when I was in B&H the other day they had it on display. It's still a great
little camera, I wish the other companies would do the same.
 
My last comment was somewhat tongue in cheek, but I still find it strange that we don’t yet have new mirrorless cameras with FF sensors available for less than a grand. I have the original A7, and it suits me fine right now. But after having it a few years, it’s odd that it is still the only option available at that price point. I don’t know. I assume I’m out of touch. I just find that the camera market these days is in a weird place.
 
Back
Top Bottom