X-Pro1 vs X-E1

I

irukandji

Newbie
Local time
9:52 PM
Joined
Oct 18, 2012
Messages
10
So I've been interested in the Fuji X cams for a while now. I'd like to pick one up but I have virtually no experience with the cameras and I've never seen them side by side.

I have tried to make a list of the differences to try to determine which one is the ticket, so far here's what I've gathered:

Build: X Pro1 is more solid, but is larger and weighs more.

LCD: X Pro1 has higher resolution, but I haven't herd anyone complain about the X-E1's screen.

Playback Button Location: Almost isn't worth mentioning but I guess the X Pro1 placement is better, since it's accessed by your shooting hand.

Flash: X-E1's has a built-in, but I almost never use flash.

Hybrid (OVF & EVF) vs. EVF:

X Pro1: OVF allows photographer to see outside of frame lines.
OVF conserves battery (1000 shots per charge).
EVF can be used at an instant.

X-E1: EVF is higher resolution.
More efficient (350 vs. 300 shots per battery using EVF).
Has diopter<which fortunately doesn't affect me.
​

I'm trying to ignore the price difference (since I'd rather end up spending more than getting the "wrong camera").

What is your opinion?
 
I've never held the XE-1.

The differencein size seems unimportant. I enjoy using the optical finder. I don't pan much, so th I prove EVF isn't compelling. A + diopter works perfectly or my shooting eye with both displays.

Before the X100S was announced I was going to sell my X100 and pick up the XE-1 as a second body. Now I think I'll just wait for the next generation hybrid finder body.
 
Xpro's OVF did it for me. I had the X-e1 and was just going to wait until the Xpro2. Well, during many very sunny outdoor shoots I was struggling to see the EVF. Exchanged for the Xpro and am glad I did. Plus, the EVF on the Xpro is still very usable, I don't really notice much difference between the two EVFs.
 
I like the ex 1 dioper and the evf works fine in the brightest sunshine ive had. To me it looks so good its like a ovf. All things considered i choose ex1 because for 1290 i got camera and 35 lens. Based on looks along pro looks best. I use the flash as well.
 
Joe should be the authority here, with one in each hand.

I know only the XE1. The diopter is crucial for me, I need -3 to shoot without glasses. If your eyes are good/young, you may have years before dioptrics (or contacts, or lasik) are a factor. The XE1 erg-factor is closer to what I like on a wrist strap (e.g., GXR/M, OM4, Pen FT). If you prefer OVF capability the choice is easy, and the XP is more M-sized if that's an erg/feel preference. I liked saving $$/size and getting the 35 1.4 as my kit choice.
 
There's just times when the OVF comes in handy. I also like the M9 size of the X-Pro1... and it looks cooler. ;)
 
they are so close in what they do but the feel is so very different because of the smaller body of the x-e1...and then there is the ovf...
i like them both and use them about equally...i love the feel of the x-e1...i have smaller hands and it fits into them so comfortably...the x-p1 is not nearly as comfortable but it is not uncomfortable to use at all. i rarely use the ovf anymore...i like the evf and even the rear lcd at times...if i had to sell one it might end up being a coin toss.
 
I didn't like the size of the XPro-1. For me, the XE-1 is perfect. It is the most Leica-like handling of any camera I have tried outside of the M system. I never understand the problems people have with EVFs. I don't mind them at all.
 
I'm going to my local camera shop today to check out both of these side by side. I like the X100, but something about spending $1000 for a fixed-lens camera doesn't appeal to me (just a personal thing). I tried the X-Pro1 and thought it was nice and I liked the size, but I was actually a little disappointed in the build quality, and I couldn't get the hang of the viewfinder(s). But in fairness to both, holding demo models in a store for a few minutes is a poor way to judge a camera.

The X-E1 looks like it might fall somewhere in between the two, and I am curious to check it out. In general, I dislike digital cameras and am partial to my Leicas, but I admit that the convenience, and sometimes performance, of digital is too much to ignore. I want an affordable digital where I could still use my M and LTM glass, and I am hoping one of these Fujis may fit the bill.
 
jody36 said:
I like the ex 1 dioper and the evf works fine in the brightest sunshine ive had. To me it looks so good its like a ovf. All things considered i choose ex1 because for 1290 i got camera and 35 lens. Based on looks along pro looks best. I use the flash as well.
Click to expand...

It is a very good EVF for sure. I have had problems on a desert shoot, and a rooftop shoot where model was in shade and I was in the sun. Its became very difficult to see the EVF. It's like the little screen went dim and I had to shield my face with my hand. I actually called my camera shop right then and asked if I could switch. I much prefer the OVF. It was somewhat like shooting with my M6 again. I often just turn the preview off and shoot away. Plus, the EVF is still there for macro, or for very precise framing. And ++ the LCD on the back is a league above the XE1's.
 
I've had both and I prefer the X-E1. Its size is perfect for me.

With the X-Pro1 I found myself using the EVF most of the time anyway, and the X-E1 has a better EVF.
 
2WK said:
Not my photo, but you can see how it compares to M6. X-E1 felt too small in my big mitts. The grip on the XE-1 was a must for me.


Fuji X-Pro1 w/35mm F1.4 EBC & Leica M6 w/35mm f2 Summicron ASPH Comparison by Japancamerahunter, on Flickr
Click to expand...

Aye, exactly the reason I went with the X-Pro1 over the X-E1. Well that and the OVF.

Could have saved a bundle if the X-E1 had suited my hands but buying it would have been a mistake for me personally. Having said that I may buy one later down the line for a 2nd body.

Only way of finding out is trying both at a dealers because YMMV, so glad I tried both before I bought.
 
i shot the xe-1 for a fashion week job here today and i agree that the body is not the most comfortable to handle. also af and viewfinder delay / freeze / "blackout" aren't very impressive... the x100 was the better camera today (and the m2 was the best.)
 
As to the eyepiece diopter correction, I have a +3 in my X-Pro1. This is not within the range of adjustment of the X-E1 or the X100 series. For some reason most manufacturers (except Panasonic) stint on the + side. Maybe there's some optical/mechanical reason for this.
 
johannielscom said:
Nobody?

10chRs
Click to expand...

The new firmware could have an impact. Focus peaking might be more useful with the XE-1 as the EVF display is better. Otherwise, I don't see how the new firmware benefits one camera more than the other.

It really depends on how much an OVF will impact your work.

There is a size difference as well, but it's small.

As I write this, on Amazon US the price difference is $400, which is not trivial. I fond the OVF useful (and I really don't care about the price) so if my XP1 disappeared I would just order a new body. If Fuji's next generation of bodies do not have OVF's, I'll buy another XP1 for a back up body.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom