Dunn
Well-known
I did some searching but still couldn't find a very clear compare and contrast in regards to my shooting.
I'm looking to add a 28mm lens to my kit. I use an M6 with primarily Tri-x and sometimes acros/delta100 and portra 400. I'm mainly concerned about the black and white though.
I'm worried the biogon will be too contrasty for my tastes, but is the ultron any less contrasty?
What I like about the ultron is the price and the extra stop. What I'm concerned about is the finder blockage. It seems pretty bad compared to the biogon.
Also, in the future I may want to make some large prints. Does the biogon have any real advantage here?
Any examples of either lens on the films I mentioned would be great. Or comparisons, if you have them.
Cheers
I'm looking to add a 28mm lens to my kit. I use an M6 with primarily Tri-x and sometimes acros/delta100 and portra 400. I'm mainly concerned about the black and white though.
I'm worried the biogon will be too contrasty for my tastes, but is the ultron any less contrasty?
What I like about the ultron is the price and the extra stop. What I'm concerned about is the finder blockage. It seems pretty bad compared to the biogon.
Also, in the future I may want to make some large prints. Does the biogon have any real advantage here?
Any examples of either lens on the films I mentioned would be great. Or comparisons, if you have them.
Cheers
bhop73
Well-known
I can't compare the two, but my CV 28 doesn't really block the finder all that much (or maybe i'm just used to it). I'm pretty happy with it overall, no complaints at all really, but i'm not as picky as some people.